Strike!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ian H

Squire
I don’t entirely disagree with that, but, it wasn’t the ONLY criteria I mentioned, you just happened to cherry pick that.

I never mentioned “profit”. Excess income in publicly owned services can be re-invested in the service for example.

Publicaly owned services are not immune to the changing environment in which they exist. Change is inevitable, and, did happen, even in the case of Royal Mail’s utopian past.

Most of your post was about the Post Office share price and dividends.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Most of your post was about the Post Office share price and dividends.

Yes, that is true.

Clue, it was a reply to a post referencing Post Office Shareholders and Dividends, which the Poster appeared to be particularly upset by.
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
The Dividend is currently just over 6%, so, just a little more than what could be made in a fixed rate saving account, at the moment.

So, I don't really feel I missed out, indeed, I feel I dodged a bullet.
This reply tells me everything.
 

Beebo

Guru
I’ve been in London all day. The tube strike is annoying everyone. The west end traffic is totally gridlocked.

I am often supportive of strikes but this one seem to have virtually zero support.

Striking for a cut in working hours seems very indulgent to me.

Can anyone justify it?
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
I’ve been in London all day. The tube strike is annoying everyone. The west end traffic is totally gridlocked.

I am often supportive of strikes but this one seem to have virtually zero support.

Striking for a cut in working hours seems very indulgent to me.

Can anyone justify it?

You're asking the wrong people. It is not up to random forum contributors to justify it...unless they work on the underground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom