briantrumpet
Timewaster
2026. You asked AI to illustrate the 2002 world cup table.
Close. I asked for some art including some nice legs. You know, curvaceous.
2026. You asked AI to illustrate the 2002 world cup table.
As no-one's guessing, I'll tell you. 1010-1030. The Harley Psalter. Good, eh?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harley_Psalter
View attachment 15668
Gg
Is it a good read? If so I'll read it after I've finished the latest Jeffrey Archer book.
As no-one's guessing, I'll tell you. 1010-1030. The Harley Psalter. Good, eh?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harley_Psalter
View attachment 15668
I figured it was old, but I thought it was Oriental!
I'd have said the same! Interesting, eh?
As did I, hence my reference to the Japan / S Korea world cup.
Reminiscent of ancient Japanese Zen.QOTD (quiz of the day).
What's the date of this artwork? (No cheating! Guesses Are Good!)
View attachment 15658
Reminiscent of ancient Japanese Zen.
View attachment 15681
Yep, exactly. That's what threw me completely!
Art's a helluva thing.
Aye, once I knew what it was it made sense.
Should have paid more attention to the Latin behind the illustration.
I was just interested if there was some tangible link, but if Gemini is right, it's a big fat no.
Gemini is pretty much spot on. There wasn't much international crossover in artistic styles at the time, so really it's just someone having a crack at something different, and it's cool that it looks like something they'd never likely seen before.
Does my head in the way influences have to be justified or reasoned in the creative world.
I don't give a f*ck if there are "obvious allusions to so and so" in a film, music, picture, book or whatever. Unless you've literally copied the thing, and it works, then it's all good.
Keith Haring put it best:
"Art is for everybody"
Don't gatekeep or curate it to levels of unfathomable tediousness.