The NCAP Soccerball Thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pross

Guru
The point is that that FIFA only make money via tv rights and advertising.
Without any European teams the value of the competition would be a fraction of its current value.

But now they’re going the Trump route so will make a fortune (in their own heads) from their own cryptocurrency and NFTs
 

Dorset Boy

Senior Member
Short term cash injection to the £20bn FIFA are sitting on, for a long term reduction in revenues.
Whilst FIFA's executives take a cut for brokering the deals.
Hmmmmm

Good on UEFA and Africa to stick their middle finger up at Infantino
 

Pross

Guru
All just a big misunderstanding based on incorrect media reporting and their just ‘opening consultation’ apparently. So definitely not Infantino having spent too much time in Trump’s company and decided he can be a dictator. Hopefully this is the beginning of the end for Infantino.
 

Pblakeney

Shaman
All just a big misunderstanding based on incorrect media reporting and their just ‘opening consultation’ apparently. So definitely not Infantino having spent too much time in Trump’s company and decided he can be a dictator. Hopefully this is the beginning of the end for Infantino.

Wanton and furious backpedaling.
 

First Aspect

Legendary Member
The AFC have also issued a negative response. But neither they nor CONCACAF have gone as far as UEFA, just criticised the process.

FIFA will heavily lobby now and emplasise the "only 20%" point, as though that won't bother grow and influence football rules etc.

It's not a done deal either way, but as long as UEFA are not involved, it's dead. And if it goes ahead without them, we will have two world govening bodies before too long.

My fear is that UEFAs solidarity will crumble before FIFA cave in.
 

Pross

Guru
David Davies pointing out that UEFA may find it hard to stop some of the smaller nations like Andorra or San Marino accepting the bribe money on offer but I don't see a World Cup with the might of the likes of those European countries playing being any more attractive than a World Cup with no European (and South American) nations so it doesn't feel like a big problem.
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
David Davies pointing out that UEFA may find it hard to stop some of the smaller nations like Andorra or San Marino accepting the bribe money on offer but I don't see a World Cup with the might of the likes of those European countries playing being any more attractive than a World Cup with no European (and South American) nations so it doesn't feel like a big problem.
I don't follow football but my thought re: UEFA and the smaller countries is that if UEFA follow through their boycott then the value of what is being privatised/sold off will be dramatically lower so those other countries won't get the money anyway.

eg the US$20 bn FIFA are expecting for World Cup, etc. won't be worth US$20 bn is UEFA are boycotting so there won't be the money to distribute to others.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
David Davies pointing out that UEFA may find it hard to stop some of the smaller nations like Andorra or San Marino accepting the bribe money on offer but I don't see a World Cup with the might of the likes of those European countries playing being any more attractive than a World Cup with no European (and South American) nations so it doesn't feel like a big problem.

The better teams in South America will not want to weaken links with Europe given the sporting rivalry between them and European countries, and also the number of players from those countries who play for teams in Europe.
 

swee'pea99

Regular
Mate of mine came up with a chant England fans could adopt across the land on the first day of the new season (barely three weeks away...soz) - our final national tribute to World Cup USA 2026:

Infantino
Donald Trump
One's a pedo
The other's a see if you can think of the last word

It' not perfect, in that it implies that neither is both, but it does scan quite nice.
 
Top Bottom