D
Deleted member 159
Guest
Do you actually understand the N. Farage we're discussing?
I'm not interested in N Farage political stance. I'm interested in the de banking which is currently happening.
Do you actually understand the N. Farage we're discussing?
I'm not interested in N Farage political stance. I'm interested in the de banking which is currently happening.
You can't seperate the two. Coutts saw a potential reputational risk.
I have three things to say about this story:
1) Farage banking at Coutts makes all his talk of metropolitan remained elites seem even more ridiculous
2) Coutts need a new PR head, because ironically, if they hadn't acted nobody would have even known that Farage banked with them
3) Farage, and anyone who supports or admires him, is a cùnt
You can't seperate the two. Coutts saw a potential reputational risk.
I have three things to say about this story:
1) Farage banking at Coutts makes all his talk of metropolitan remained elites seem even more ridiculous
2) Coutts need a new PR head, because ironically, if they hadn't acted nobody would have even known that Farage banked with them
3) Farage, and anyone who supports or admires him, is a cùnt
I see you have issues
You can't seperate the two. C
You have to separate the two, concentrate on the content, not the author.
Otherwise, you just make a fatuous knee jerk reaction of the type you, and others, have made.
I probably qualify for your description of a c*nt, because I agree with some of Farage's patter.
By the way, it's separate not 'seperate'.
I am genuinely surprised that a man of your spelling calibre would make that error.
I'm a few steps ahead of you in the thinking. You'll get there.
Not really.
"It's Farage it must be crap" is not thinking at all.
"It's Farage, it's usually crap, but I must assess each case individually," is the only grown up approach.
It's clear, if only from the reaction, Farage has a point about the banking industry.
Also worth bearing in mind Farage has few, if any, friends in Westminster, so the government's preferred reaction would have been to ignore/fob him off.
That they have done the reverse confirms Farage has a very good point, at least on first blush.
No, the Tory machine has come out in support of him because they are pursuing an electoral strategy based on culture war. This is part of it.
Farage is talking both personally and about the largely little people who have had accounts closed for non-financial reasons.
To mangle a quote from a judge in a libel case (we lost): it is as plain as a pikestaff Farage has valid points to make.
The problem with conspiracy theories is you have to suggest ever more ludicrous twists and turns to try to shoehorn the facts into what, in this case, is a relatively straightforward story of: 'man highlights questionable conduct by the banks'.
If you want to look for hidden motivation, no one likes bankers, although they are not quite as bad in the public mind as journalists and estate agents.
That dislike makes it more attractive to those in power to push this story forward.