Twitter under Musk....

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Cirrus

Active Member
Well all any of us can really do is

"Be the change you want to see" 😇

Rather than lower our own standards, in a race to the bottom :whistle:

Then I eagerly await some positive posts from you on various things, just to see how it's done mi amiga.:whistle:
 

mudsticks

Squire
Then I eagerly await some positive posts from you on various things, just to see how it's done mi amiga.:whistle:

Who was it that started the 'Good News' Only' thread?? .:whistle:

You don't expect me to lie about things being good, if in fact they're c@rp do you??

PXL_20220429_112521271.jpg


Pollinators happily doing their thing unhindered here..

Because I don't use chemical pesticides on my farm..

Good news eh??

But no thanks to the gov reversing the ban on bee killing neonicitinoids.

In other personal 'Good News' I'm off this weekend on a coast and country walking and camping trip with my callipygian bf..

Straight outta the gate..

See you around :hello:
 

Cirrus

Active Member
Who was it that started the 'Good News' Only' thread?? .:whistle:

You don't expect me to lie about things being good, if in fact they're c@rp do you??

View attachment 1089

Pollinators happily doing their thing unhindered here..

Because I don't use chemical pesticides on my farm..

Good news eh??

But no thanks to the gov reversing the ban on bee killing neonicitinoids.

In other personal 'Good News' I'm off this weekend on a coast and country walking and camping trip with my callipygian bf..

Straight outta the gate..

See you around :hello:

Have fun, hope you get some blue skies....
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
A silly step, you either enforce something or you don't but they started earlier with adding that something trump said might be fake news, they didn't do that to Obama, Bush or others who ae just as guilty of spreading false information. Or those democrats cheering on Antifa


Technically he never called for violence, except if you take out only one part of what he said put it in a tweet and keep on repeating that, like all the leftish and rightish war mongers did. it would be easy to show that wheren't it for the fact those tweets are unavailable as the account is blocked.

And as per the inquiry into this that didn;'t get to much attention, the national guard was on standby but standing back because of some leftish politicians claiming Trump would use the ''Martial law'' and the precedence of the National guard would be seen as a attempted coup by Trump.

So the capital storming was more a result of multiple things come together both from the populist left and the populist right then it was because of Trumps speech, it surely didn't help either but blaming it all on Trump is be-ing blind for the real issues at stake and will surely lead to a repeat in a slightly different setting in the future.

This is such a load of sh!te I don't even know where to start with it.

Trump has incited violence on more than one occasion, on multiple platforms.

What false information is it that Obama spread? I'd love to know.
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
For my sins the only social media I use is this and the original CC. This forum has enough weirdos without using other sites. Although, come to think of it there are more weirdos on the main CC. The ones here have barks worse than their bites.

I also prefer the pub and my chats/arguments with friends and some who are not friends, but acquaintances, but this internet lark is more interesting than most of what my wife likes to watch on the TV.
Maybe when Elon buys it you'll warm to it....seems like your sort of guy 🙄
Screenshot_20220429-184754.png
 

icowden

Squire
A silly step, you either enforce something or you don't but they started earlier with adding that something trump said might be fake news, they didn't do that to Obama, Bush or others who ae just as guilty of spreading false information. Or those democrats cheering on Antifa
Absolutely. That's why Parliament never enacts any new laws. You either enforce something or you don't. You make all the decisions at the start, never amend existing laws or introduce new ones. That would be the work of a fantasist.

Technically he never called for violence, except if you take out only one part of what he said put it in a tweet and keep on repeating that, like all the leftish and rightish war mongers did. it would be easy to show that wheren't it for the fact those tweets are unavailable as the account is blocked.
There's a full article here

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tweets-attacks-capitol-violence-b1786246.html
The New York University School of Law’s “Just Security” group says it has identified the key tweets and incendiary attacks from Mr Trump’s final year in office that culminated in the attack. The group, which analyses US national security law and policy, pinpointed 14 of the outgoing president’s tweets, and 10 inflammatory speeches that it claims created the conditions for his supporters to try to derail the democratic process in his name.
Mr Trump was impeached in the House on Wednesday for “incitement of insurrection” following the mayhem.

So the capital storming was more a result of multiple things come together both from the populist left and the populist right then it was because of Trumps speech, it surely didn't help either but blaming it all on Trump is be-ing blind for the real issues at stake and will surely lead to a repeat in a slightly different setting in the future.
Yes, I remember the populist left out there goading the Proud Boys and boasting about how they had won an election by voting. Failing to provide any evidence that the vote *wasn't* being rigged, boasting about how they were going to win no matter how many people voted for Trump etc.

Oh no. Hang on. I didn't. Because - they didn't.

I do seem to remember some Orange bloke using his massive reach on Twitter to clam that the vote had been rigged, that "they want to take away your second amendment rights" and "you have to show strength".

Isn't it weird that so many of the people being tried for storming the capitol building seem to believe that Trump told them to do it?
 
This is such a load of sh!te I don't even know where to start with it.
by not responding if you have not something usefull to say?
Trump has incited violence on more than one occasion, on multiple platforms.
No the usual crybabies say it's inciting violence that's something else.


Absolutely. That's why Parliament never enacts any new laws. You either enforce something or you don't. You make all the decisions at the start, never amend existing laws or introduce new ones. That would be the work of a fantasist.
It was about twitters rules and how they adjust them for persons they don't like. There are many more use presidents in the past who either lied or take a very creative take with reality. (for example saying 98% of scientist agree there is climate change, followed by and that human caused it, while the actual fact is 98% believes there is climate change, the opinions on that human solely caused it or much more divided)

it's behind a paywall i really not going to buy an independent subscription to read what kind of bit you cherry picked from an article to prove your point.


Yes, I remember the populist left out there goading the Proud Boys and boasting about how they had won an election by voting. Failing to provide any evidence that the vote *wasn't* being rigged, boasting about how they were going to win no matter how many people voted for Trump etc.
Must been an other planet where you live on, because i remember countless recounts a voting company that was playing along on twitters and that kind off stuff. Trump was saying he won by a landslide but didn't really have the numbers to prove it, that had not so much to do with the proud boys or the other ones qanon i believe. They where the ones coming up with stories about how votes where stolen, they probably mixed rothshild/illimuniati/ whatever other conspiracy they could find in the mix. and in all fairness it was very close in the end results.. with an additional research showing nearly 20% only voted Biden because it was not Trump.

Oh no. Hang on. I didn't. Because - they didn't.

I do seem to remember some Orange bloke using his massive reach on Twitter to clam that the vote had been rigged, that "they want to take away your second amendment rights" and "you have to show strength".

Isn't it weird that so many of the people being tried for storming the capitol building seem to believe that Trump told them to do it?
Do you remember what he said during that rally before people stormed the capital or are you just responding to what media like the independent tells you he said?
Because there is an difference, and for the record i am no fan of Trump but i'm even less of a fan of false narrative and the whole capital story is riddled with it and if you want to look for someone to blame you need to look for someone's the blame because both republicans and democrats created the circumstances for that situation and how it got out of control in the way it did.
 
Don't be silly, Trump's following on twitter was huge, he would have been a massive draw for them, the relationship was very mutually beneficial.
Facts show differently and if you know just a little bit about us politics you would know how much american companies are dragged into it. Twitter and most big tech are more democrats minded then republicans, more Biden than Trump.

Every time someone complains about the Independent paywall it makes me feel like some sort of genius hacking savant.
i known ho to bypass it just don't feel like it, if i post something i always avoid paywalls. apperently i'm the only one?
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
i known ho to bypass it just don't feel like it, if i post something i always avoid paywalls. apperently i'm the only one?

I can only go by what you write.

Regarding your 98% of climate scientists claim, I recall pulling you up on a list of climate change denying 'scientists' which included amongst their number one Piers Effing Corbyn so excuse me if I dismiss that point without further investigation.
 
Top Bottom