First Aspect
Squire
Which liar is telling the truth?
Just watched a piece about the Intel and the threat of switching off Intel.
As usual, it's not so back and white and there is no 'switch'. Sure, the US can switch off their intel.
'Intel' is a patchwork of current targets, cyber information, movement of personnel etc etc It is multifaceted.. Oil refineries don't move. Ukraine knows where they are. Ukraine knows where the data centres are and where the factories are.
The US paused Intel in 2025 - it didn't really hit the headlines as Ukraine has been been budling bridges and sharing information with France, UK, Finland and Japan ever since as leaning on one source so heavily puts you at risk.
In fact, as a slight digression, Musk has been begging the Indian govt. to buy Starlink access.
Elon Musk publicly criticized the Indian government and billionaire Mukesh Ambani on X, accusing them of delaying Starlink's commercial launch for over four to five years to protect a telecom monopoly.
However, as soon as they saw Musk shutting off Starlink, the Indian govt. said no. They did not want to be defenceless at the flick of a switch.
The Finns have the ICC satellite system, the French and UK have their own and the Japanese have ISQS, the Germans have also got a network.
Where the current switch off of Starlink really matters, is live targets - ships, boats, defence systems, missile launchers - stuff that moves and of course, tracking of incoming missiles.
The fixed physical targets will always be there and Ukraine should be able to continue hitting them.
We hope that this pause is temporary. It also may backfire on the Americans who are using Ukrainian intelligence to defend targets in the gulf plus there are thousands of Americans in Ukraine who have now become more vulnerable.
Neither Starlink nor Starshield have been made available in Russia, so it doesn't directly do anything to protect the US ally's diesel production and storage facilities.
I would have hoped that Putin would have noted NATO's refusal to get involved in Trümp's Iranian war as a clear signal that NATO is totally focused on being a defensive organisation and won't get involved in preemptive aggression (not even when under pressure from a major NATO member).
I would have hoped that Putin would have noted NATO's refusal to get involved in Trümp's Iranian war as a clear signal that NATO is totally focused on being a defensive organisation and won't get involved in preemptive aggression (not even when under pressure from a major NATO member).
I have always thought that amongst the dwindling numbers still dreaming of a socialist utopia in this country there are many who still cling to the idea of Russia as a socialist state after the revolution despite its quick fall from those ideals and change into authoritarian state capitalism.
He was pro-EU before Russian pressure.
Ukraine was pro-EU.
He brought the problems on himself and fled to Russia.
Yet another example of Russia interfering with another country’s politics.
What was your initial point?
I was out for a ride this morning, part of which was due to involve passing the front of the Senedd building. When I got there it was blocked because of a visit by Charlie to officially open the new term. As well as the police and military there was the obligatory demo and to my amusement there was one amongst their number waving a huge hammer and sickle flag. Power to the people!