Google's CEO saying that the reason there's intense backlash to AI is because "humans aren't evolved enough to process that much change."
Au contraire, mon ami, I'd suggest that the genius of the human brain is that we have seen right through it.
As you say, it seems all about more power, more money & more wealth to those who have already shown complete lack of concern for society and the impacts of what they are doing (damage to society, climate, services, environment, etc.).The people who will gain from AI are those selling it, and employers.
Everyone else will lose in the long run.
It's almost become a meaningless term.‘AI washing’: firms are scrambling to rebrand themselves as tech-focused
UK companies are performing “yoga-level” stretches to describe themselves as AI specialists in an attempt to capitalise on the buzz around the technology, public relations firms have said.
Weary communications executives tasked with securing media coverage for brands have complained that bosses in low-tech industries or running businesses that use automation but not generative AI, are increasingly demanding they are pitched to journalists as artificial intelligence companies.
...
Last month, the US shoe company AllBirds “pivoted” to to acquiring AI graphics processing units, while genetics companies have hyped AI-powered blood tests. In inboxes this month, there have been press releases about AI-powered basketball hoops, and AI-powered lasers that – somehow – protect women from predators on crowded underground platforms.
More AI madness.
It's almost become a meaningless term.
All demonstrating that LLM AIs are not particularly useful as even if they happen to provide accurate info, you can't trust it and have to double.trebble check everything by which time you might as well have gone "traditional".
All demonstrating that LLM AIs are not particularly useful as even if they happen to provide accurate info, you can't trust it and have to double.trebble check everything by which time you might as well have gone "traditional".
Trust them and one thing you can be sure of is you will be caught out, will be misinformed and will be getting it wrong, you just won't know when nor how badly.
"I inferred" implies a completely amoral intelligence. A human would have been embarrassed at being found out*.
" Except Boris Johnson, of course.
"I guessed". Not that intelligent then.
I wrote an article which was published on an area of expertise. It was meant to be a vaguely witty, but at the same time helpful. Imagine a title like "The best way to grow a rainbow unicorn"
Now if I ask AI how to grow a rainbow unicorn it quotes my words and my analogies back to me.