dutchguylivingintheuk
Über Member
Agreed current moderation is really bad, musk hasn't changed a thing yet.Yes, I'm criticising current moderation. Despite complaints they often fail to remove content that most people would find objectionable. Death threats and pro-paedophilia accounts don't always contravene their terms and conditions for example. It's not that Twitter aren't aware of them.
As Albion says though, Musk cutting the number of moderators wouldn't improve that. It would require a change in emphasis in the direction of moderation.
Quite interesting to see what happens with all the celebrities and blue tick accounts who said they would leave if he bought Twitter. They seem to staying at the moment.
Jup but Twitter is also still very important to advertisers despite the hell it can be, every us elections you get those ''if you're democrats don't buy from this brand and vice versa'' And Musk is very aware of what he was buying he has practically invented creating twitter controversy and use it for it own gains.An interesting article on The Verge - Welcome to Hell, Elon.
I think it highlights a whole raft of issues associated with owning social media, but the biggest bear-trap is assuming it is an engineering issue rather than a social one. Plus that social media is really simply a medium to get eye-balls on advertising space. And if the social media space becomes a toxic dumpster-fire then advertisers will run a mile. If anyone needs a "safe space" it is corporate advertisers promoting carefully curated brands.
Look at the past, Tesla would have been killed one way or an other by big car or oil companies if it wasn't for the role of social media. They are just not able to control things anymore like they used to do.
Agreed that the crying about the $8 dollar is a bit silly, although i think it's more about anyone being able to do so.I don't get why celebrities are whining over paying for a blue tick. If you don't want one don't pay for it. You'll have to drop down to just being one of the regular Twitter plebs though.
At the moment Eric Idle has 500k followers to whom he can promote any book, film, or project, for free. $8 a month for an advertising platform that reaches half a million people (not including re Tweets) doesn't seem bad value. Celebrities just don't like paying for stuff and I think they simply don't like the idea that being a Blue Tick won't be quite as exclusive as it was if anyone can buy one.
People always imagine they are bigger than the platform. None of those who said they would leave Twitter seem to have done so yet.
But it fits a bit in what Musk stated before after and still says he wants to stop the circle of an particular group to ''hijack twitter'' i'm not talking about bots but more about the opinion police for example, not sure if having a blue tick is going to change much to that, but he didn't just state that it would be open for all he also stated that there would be a second under title for organisations goverments etc. (i believe goverments already have something like that)
So maybe in the future it's just something to see who wasted his money, just like it is on some websites with similar systems.