BRFR Cake Stop 'breaking news' miscellany

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Trickle-down economics in action.

View attachment 10029

Without knowing what %ge of the population comprise the “middle class”, what does that graph tell us?
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet
Without knowing what %ge of the population comprise the “middle class”, what does that graph tell us?

It says at the bottom of the graphic.

1758273757219.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Stevo 666

Über Member
Without knowing what %ge of the population comprise the “middle class”, what does that graph tell us?

Stats are like people: if you torture them enough they'll tell you whatever you want to hear. Although knowing that you can be a massive success in the US isn't really a bad thing.
 

Bazzer

Über Member
Maybe some interesting thought experiments to be had about smart glasses and the possibility of widespread covert filming (obvs without consent) by members of the public. I guess that the law will be extremely slow to catch up with the consequences.

View attachment 10015
It is also almost certain that Temu will currently be in contact with a manufacturer for knock offs.
The 21st century version of the "X-ray specs" that used to appear in the back pages of MAD and similar publications.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet
This is well worth a read, on the value (or not) of online 'debate'.

https://iandunt.substack.com/p/why-you-should-never-argue-online-bbb

Sometimes I find myself staring at the exclamation mark key. Perhaps I could use it, just once. Perhaps it wouldn't be so bad. It would fix a lot of things. Everyone knows that an exclamation mark denotes frivolity. It takes the edge off any sentence. It allows you to raise a critical point while communicating that you are not being severe. It allows you to denote irony. But once you'd done it, you'd always know. Even on your deathbed, it would haunt you. You are the kind of daffodil who uses exclamation marks.

[...]

I was really quite good at arguing online, back in the old days, on Twitter. I have very few skills, but I am pretty good at pithy abuse - belittling people in a way that looked like victory but was in fact just meanness with an economic use of words. But the truth was, I was becoming cruel, or there was at least a possibility of cruelty developing in me. Each instance involved a subtraction from the parts of myself I wanted to encourage - connection, human empathy, understanding. All these things I've always found permanently out of reach.

This is why you never really win an argument online. You see people have them and even seemingly win them, but they come out of it looking as dirty and bedraggled as the other person. Everyone comes out looking a twat.
 

Pblakeney

Über Member
This is well worth a read, on the value (or not) of online 'debate'.

https://iandunt.substack.com/p/why-you-should-never-argue-online-bbb

Not arguing with the point on there but it does highlight that language evolves. And possibly I haven't. 🤪
I still think an exclamation mark is to emphasise a point, not frivolity. 🤔
 

Ianonabike

New Member
This is well worth a read, on the value (or not) of online 'debate'.

https://iandunt.substack.com/p/why-you-should-never-argue-online-bbb
Certainly worth reflecting on: "the truth was, I was becoming cruel, or there was at least a possibility of cruelty developing in me. Each instance involved a subtraction from the parts of myself I wanted to encourage - connection, human empathy, understanding."

Some people take political discussion very personally. While I can sort of see why – politics affects all of us to a greater or lesser extent - you never really get anywhere when you go straight for the jugular. People will just tune you out.
 
Last edited:

Pblakeney

Über Member
I’ve just read that Apple have cancelled Jon Stewart’s show (didn’t know he had one) for “not playing nice”.
Apparently he and Cobert are getting together to do something but nobody knows what, and TV companies are panicking.
Wonder who else could be joining them?
PS - Jon Stewart’s TV contract is up for renewal soon and is rumoured not to be renewed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Evil_Breakfast

New Member
I’ve just read that Apple have cancelled Jon Stewart’s show (didn’t know he had one) for “not playing nice”.
Apparently he and Cobert are getting together to do something but nobody knows what, and TV companies are panicking.
Wonder who else could be joining them?
PS - Jon Stewart’s TV contract is up for renewal soon and is rumoured not to be renewed.

Pulled from his Wiki page #Caveat
So, how can he be canned twice? 🤔

"After his contract with HBO ended, Stewart signed a multi-year show deal with Apple. On September 30, 2021, Stewart's new series, The Problem with Jon Stewart, premiered on Apple TV+. The series featured hour-long, single-subject episodes. In addition to hosting the show, Stewart served as executive producer through his company, Busboy Productions.[135] The show was canceled after two seasons, allegedly due to Apple executives disagreeing with coverage of China and artificial intelligence.[136] Apple's cancelation attracted criticism from the United States House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.[137]"
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Pblakeney

Über Member
Pulled from his Wiki page #Caveat
So, how can he be canned twice? 🤔

"After his contract with HBO ended, Stewart signed a multi-year show deal with Apple. On September 30, 2021, Stewart's new series, The Problem with Jon Stewart, premiered on Apple TV+. The series featured hour-long, single-subject episodes. In addition to hosting the show, Stewart served as executive producer through his company, Busboy Productions.[135] The show was canceled after two seasons, allegedly due to Apple executives disagreeing with coverage of China and artificial intelligence.[136] Apple's cancelation attracted criticism from the United States House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.[137]"

Ah well. That’s t’internet for you. 😉
Still think my post as regards the future holds true.
 
Top Bottom