glasgowcyclist
Veteran
With the information we know now, because of this acquittal and the judge ordering the further background of Kaba to be publicizes, i'm not sure i agree. Before Kaba was branded as a victim of police violence's who would never harm a fly, now we know he was quite the opposite a dangerous gang member. and that there is a £10.000 bounty on said officers head.
But i agree it's an slippery slope but i think in this time and age where it is so easy to get media attention and create a false narrative about someone there has to be a way for a judge to order the truth to be released like what happened during this acquittal.
But to be honest i don't know if charging the officer was really required for this background about the ''victim''/offender to be released.
An accused person’s previous behaviour or convictions are generally inadmissible as evidence, so that they may receive a fair trial. The jury must be allowed to focus on the factual evidence against the accused rather than be swayed by their reaction to the accused’s past record.
I feel that your post above demonstrates the need for the current position.