These days it's really easy to just ask Copilot stuff if you don't know about a subject.
But if you then copilot stuff you do know, you know why it seems an bad idea right?
Fact is vehicles using hydrogen as their main propulsion but with an ice or eletric engines are around for years and haven't fallen apart, so copilot presumably doesn't show the full context in this case.
probably because your question is too simple.
Do you have a point?
The market did decide and chose EV cars.
The car companies decided and then came up with models that didn't align with costumer demand.
That's one way of looking at it. But the viability of Tesla, particularly in the early days, relied on wokey dokey government policy. That is also what is driving uptake in the UK and Europe.
Tesla particularly before the model C was a status symbol, a showpiece that was nice to drive or be driven around in aswell. it served as replacement or along with cars like the Mercedes S class. currently we can indeed goverment policies being the main driver about purchases just as poeple replacing their EV's with ice cars again. and then we see an other hurdle especially if you expect people to buy these cars with their own money without goverment funding and that is second hand value or better worded the lack thereoff.
You could argue that the market has decided that batteries were better than liquid hydrogen I suppose. I would suggest it is physics, chemistry and engineering, but this semantics.
The market responded to goverments wanting quick soluttions and all kind of stupid bold statement about taking actions
now battery / EV technology isn't new, so it was a safe concession.
from which most of them have either come back in full or scaled down their plans. Because the lack of sales.
