A
albion
Guest
https://www.plansponsor.com/state-anti-esg-coalition-clarifies-policy-goals/
Otherwise known as the kill the planet coalition.
Otherwise known as the kill the planet coalition.
More people "doing their bit": https://www.heraldscotland.com/spor...ld-championships-road-race-halted-protesters/
I’m surprised that the Tyre Extinguishers have moved on from lentil enabled deflation to criminal damage. Exeter sounds quite a lawless place.
View attachment 4371
https://news.sky.com/story/wimbledo...ealership-in-retaliation-over-deaths-12935495
I’m surprised that the Tyre Extinguishers have moved on from lentil enabled deflation to criminal damage. Exeter sounds quite a lawless place.
https://news.sky.com/story/wimbledo...ealership-in-retaliation-over-deaths-12935495
Have you any answer to anything?
I wonder if all those clapping the idea of abolishing capitalism have thought this through.
The jobs that pay for their cars, homes, smartphones and other toys would largely go the journey.
Some genuine poverty might cause them to reconsider their view.
Don’t they all have public sector jobs?
This is the problem when "the science" is being used for an economic and political agenda. The same constituency that ditches science when it comes to gender (other threads are available) insists science is Holy Writ when it comes to climate. This can trigger a certain level of scepticism ...I wonder if all those clapping the idea of abolishing capitalism have thought this through.
Someone pointed out during the occupy era that if you brought down the wealth of those running corporations to achieve more equality, then if the protesters wanted to have more equality with those in the developing world they would in turn have to reduce their wealth in a similar way. That idea never occurred to them - equality has its limitations. Happy to carry on using the devices and networks the corporations provided though!The jobs that pay for their cars, homes, smartphones and other toys would largely go the journey.
The Green party here in the Fatherland are having problems with voter share because they are perceived as being the party of forbidding you to have this or do that or go there. Goverment overreach. Imposing costs on the less well off. A new command economy replete with thou shalt nots. Now there are still plenty who remember the command economy of the old DDR, which was not particularly wealthy and in which levels of pollution beggared belief. You couldn't protest against it either, this was not allowed.Some genuine poverty might cause them to reconsider their view.
Someone pointed out during the occupy era that if you brought down the wealth of those running corporations to achieve more equality, then if the protesters wanted to have more equality with those in the developing world they would in turn have to reduce their wealth in a similar way. That idea never occurred to them - equality has its limitations.
Don’t they all have public sector jobs?
Yes, but if we do nothing they will largely be irrelevant. He who dies with the most toys is still dead.The jobs that pay for their cars, homes, smartphones and other toys would largely go the journey.
Much of the world lives in poverty, in part because of our consumption addiction.Some genuine poverty might cause them to reconsider their view.
Some amazing telepathy going on here. Just PERHAPS those seeking more social equity globally HAVE realised that we could live with less "stuff", and that can be achieved at the same time as less childhood misery (for example) in the 3rd world.
Simplistic example; all those charity ads saying "For just the price of a coffee a week ..."; and in fact you CAN do a huuge amount overseas with such small sums.
Don’t they all have public sector jobs?