spen666
Well-Known Member
Those of us who work in the Criminal Justice and have experience of people being wrongly convicted ( sometimes later rectified) would not support the death penalty as it is irreversible.
Even so called forensic proof is not infallible.
Remember George Bulsara convicted of murder of Jill Dando on Basis of forensic evidence
Maguire 7 convicted on forensic evidence of IRA crimes
To name just two.
In relation to DNA evidence - this again is not infallible as the instance of identical DNA between members of Afro Carribean community has never been explained
This is without considering the morals or ethics - such as killing is wrong, so we will kill you. A bit like Animal Farm some are more equal than others -ie state sponsored killers are ok, but non state sponsored killers are not
Even so called forensic proof is not infallible.
Remember George Bulsara convicted of murder of Jill Dando on Basis of forensic evidence
Maguire 7 convicted on forensic evidence of IRA crimes
To name just two.
In relation to DNA evidence - this again is not infallible as the instance of identical DNA between members of Afro Carribean community has never been explained
This is without considering the morals or ethics - such as killing is wrong, so we will kill you. A bit like Animal Farm some are more equal than others -ie state sponsored killers are ok, but non state sponsored killers are not