Should england be spending more on water infrastructure like reservoirs, rather than spending it on a train line through the country that no one seems to want???
They should, to start with, stop with coming up with responses that do well on twitter, radio and the news because they show how ''engaged'' they are while they really don't give two f*cks the camera's stop rolling.
What we need, in the Uk, in Europe is politicians who chose that job because they want to do something for their community and the country because they believe in soluttions and not problems, who believe in the power of poeple andnot party sponsors, why beleive in the power in the oath to the country and not the power of the likes of persimmon homes etc. etc. etc.
With that spirit and mindset in the Netherlands ages ago they came up with the idea of ''waterschappen'' with translates roughly as watercouncil a seperate goverment body(now goverment body it started in 1122 as a collaboration) that has to this day one or more people on every busy waterway with not other job to monitor the water (too high too low etc.) And alltugh not perfect they are crying now too that the water is too low instead of finding an solution(for example millions of litters flow to the Rhine towars the sea in case of the Netherlands little effort to divert it to draught affected area's, little effort because the system is already there as part of the bigger water mangement systems to deal with floods)
So if more reservoirs could help, it could be but i think the main issues is the mindset, how many area's are there not where you pay and extra premium on your insurance because it is an area that frequently floods? Let the poor people pay so the problem doesn't go away.
We might have droughts now but in a few months we will have floods again, if you want to fix water issues you have to fix the organisation first, and than come with an working solution following the water from where it starts to where it ends giving it room to expand where needed.