My intention was to highlight the fact that Braverman is, I'm pretty certain, wrong in her assertion about the law.
I think she's genuinely ignorant or misunderstands. If, as a Law Officer, she's using her position to deliberately misstate the law for political gain she's unfit for office. She's literally licensing schools where heads or perhaps religiously driven Academy trusts have a 'moral' issue with trans people to tell troubled young people that it's all in their heads and they can knuckle down as boys or girls. But then, as several commentators including the doyen of Law writer's Joshua Rozenberg state or imply she lacks the professional and intellectual heft required for the post she's unfit anyway.
The judges described her attempt to overturn the sentences of those men who killed PC Andrew Harper in terms which were Judge speak for utterly misguided and ignorant. In effect trying to plead that the distinguished sentencing judge should have overridden the relevant sentencing guideline.