Free speech

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/i/status/2019170466179739876

 

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/i/status/2019146257864839249

 

[CXRAndy]

Its all about control

Start them young, easier to manipulate


View: https://x.com/i/status/2025085656582545532

 

[TailWindHome]

Elon wants as many teens as possible on his nonce site.

 

[CXRAndy]

Elon wants as many teens as possible on his nonce site.

Fortunate thats adults/kids can access any site via VPN

VPNs will be the next attack point for governments

 

[icowden]

Elon wants as many teens as possible on his nonce site.

Always reminds me of this:-

 

[TailWindHome]

Free speech people going to be all over this one.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czr06j7j5zjo

 

[CXRAndy]

Why not, government secret services spying directly upon a person, accessing private information.

This hold true for any person or citizen journalists.

Unless there is clear illegal activity presented in front if a judge, no access to said person's private communications

 

[TailWindHome]

Why not, government secret services spying directly upon a person, accessing private information.

This hold true for any person or citizen journalists.

Unless there is clear illegal activity presented in front if a judge, no access to said person's private communications

Lets see

 

[AuroraSaab]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgv785n23eo

The correct decision imo.

'Stephen Evans, chief executive of the National Secular Society, said after the decision: "The High Court has rightly rejected this wrongheaded attempt to introduce a blasphemy law by the back door.

"However offensive some may have found the Quran-burning protest, it was lawful.

"Criminal law protects people from harm, not from being offended.

"This judgment makes clear that it is not the state's job to police religious sensibilities. A hostile – even violent – reaction to speech cannot be allowed to determine whether that speech is criminal".'