Gender again. Sorry!

[AuroraSaab]

Puberty blockers are prescribed for other clinical applications without the same evidence requirement demanded by Cass.

Here you are, bringing it up in Post # ...084.
I then quote it and reply using the term precocious puberty.

It's a minor point but I'll point it out because one of your tactics on here is to endlessly repeat 'You're lying.... you're making stuff up..'

It's a deliberate tactic of just slinging mud and hoping it sticks, then the mask drops altogether and you're back to calling me a 'lying c.unt'. Your life must be exhausting, trying to keep up the pretence.

Another UK sports organisation sees sense.
Ice Hockey have introduced new regs with a protected female category.


View: https://x.com/runthinkwrite/status/1898072065476894960

 

[monkers]

Here you are, bringing it up in Post # ...084.
I then quote it and reply using the term precocious puberty.

It's a minor point but I'll point it out because one of your tactics on here is to endlessly repeat 'You're lying.... you're making stuff up ..'.

It's a deliberate tactic of just slinging mud and hoping it sticks, then the mask drops altogether and you're back to calling me a 'lying c.unt'. Your life must be exhausting, trying to keep up the pretence.

Another UK sports organisation sees sense.
Ice Hockey have introduced new regs with a protected female category.


View: https://x.com/runthinkwrite/status/1898072065476894960

So your now claim is that you are correct that I said it and wrote that placing it in speech marks, and thereafter presenting evidence that I didn't say it in post 084, and while still claiming that you are not the liar.

I'm busy shaking my head in disbelief.

I mean seriously, what the actual fark.

 

[AuroraSaab]

No idea what that nonsensical para means. People can literally read the thread and see you introduced it first. Have a biscuit and a lie down.

 

[monkers]

No idea what that nonsensical para means. People can literally read the thread and see you introduced it first. Have a biscuit and a lie down.

You're an idiot. You invented a quote. When challenged on your invention, you just doubled down, just as all ultra-conservative reactionary nincomcoops do.

You criticised the introduction of something that you had introduced yourself. Somehow you think that my fault.

 

[classic33]

No idea what that nonsensical para means. People can literally read the thread and see you introduced it first. Have a biscuit and a lie down.

You introduced Puberty Blockers into this thread,
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/post-48507
and Precocious puberty.
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/post-51085

 

[icowden]

You introduced Puberty Blockers into this thread,
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/post-48507
and Precocious puberty.
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/post-51085

Maybe that's why this thread never seems to mature...

 

[AuroraSaab]

You introduced Puberty Blockers into this thread,
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/post-48507
and Precocious puberty.
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/post-51085

In the most recent discussion, which is what we are talking about, it was your mate who introduced mention of their prescription for non gender related conditions, ie precocious puberty without using that term. Kudos on knowing how to use the search function tho.

 

[classic33]

In the most recent discussion, which is what we are talking about, it was your mate who introduced mention of their prescription for non gender related conditions, ie precocious puberty without using that term. Kudos on knowing how to use the search function tho.

So you move the goalposts, to suit yourself, again.

 

[multitool]

In the most recent discussion, which is what we are talking about, it was your mate who introduced mention of their prescription for non gender related conditions, ie precocious puberty without using that term. Kudos on knowing how to use the search function tho.

From the woman who was lecturing us all on how to be kind in our posting

 

[monkers]

In the most recent discussion, which is what we are talking about, it was your mate who introduced mention of their prescription for non gender related conditions, ie precocious puberty without using that term. Kudos on knowing how to use the search function tho.

The more you reply, the more of a twat you make yourself.

You play the role of the grammar Nazi (such a surprise) on the forum. Only today you tried to make some point about a missing comma on a different thread; getting it wrong in the process.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you are clueless about speech marks. You quoted me in quote marks. When challenged you gave the post number that the quote was lifted from. Only it wasn't there, and as usually you are behaving like a spratt on a hook.

What a muppet.

 

[Ian H]

Fukky Nell! This thread is getting so tedious that I'm thinking of changing my pronouns.

 

[AuroraSaab]

So you move the goalposts, to suit yourself, again.

Why on earth would I be bringing up a post from 2023? It's your mate, in post #16084, a few pages back from this very one, who reintroduced the (poor) argument that giving pb's for other conditions means you can give them for gender issues.

From the woman who was lecturing us all on how to be kind in our posting

Sarcasm is the equivalent of calling people c.unts, twunts, dickheads, morons, or saying they have a hard on for this, that, and the other, is it?

The more you reply, the more of a twat you make yourself.

You play the role of the grammar Nazi (such a surprise) on the forum. Only today you tried to make some point about a missing comma on a different thread; getting it wrong in the process.

I mention your grammar because you spend a lot of time calling people thick, stupid, morons, f*ckwits .... I don't care about people's grammar or spelling but I'm going to highlight your hypocrisy and misplaced arrogance about your intellect when the point arises.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you are clueless about speech marks. You quoted me in quote marks. When challenged you gave the post number that the quote was lifted from. Only it wasn't there, and as usually you are behaving like a spratt on a hook.

What a muppet.

https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/page-1073

It's literally right where I said it was. You posted it on Friday at 14.38.

If only you had ended there. You might have spared us another public unravelling over some trivial and imaginary gotcha that only existed in your head.

 

[monkers]

Why on earth would I be bringing up a post from 2023? It's your mate, in post #16084, a few pages back from this very one, who reintroduced the (poor) argument that giving pb's for other conditions means you can give them for gender issues.



Sarcasm is the equivalent of calling people c.unts, twunts, dickheads, morons, or saying they have a hard on for this, that, and the other, is it?


I mention your grammar because you spend a lot of time calling people thick, stupid, morons, f*ckwits .... I don't care about people's grammar or spelling but I'm going to highlight your hypocrisy and misplaced arrogance about your intellect when the point arises.




https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/page-1073

It's literally right where I said it was. You posted it on Friday at 14.38.

View attachment 7510

If only you had ended there. You might have spared us another public unravelling over some trivial and imaginary gotcha that only existed in your head.

Oh sit down.

It does not say ''precocious puberty''.

That's your invention.

 

[multitool]

Sarcasm is the equivalent of calling people c.unts, twunts, dickheads, morons, or saying they have a hard on for this, that, and the other, is it?

Yes, literally every post of mine I'm calling lots of people a cûnt, aren't I

mention your grammar because you spend a lot of time calling people thick, stupid, morons, f*ckwits .... I don't care about people's grammar or spelling but I'm going to highlight your hypocrisy and misplaced arrogance about your intellect when the point arises.

Oh looks like Aurora is having a meltdown at Monkers now. Better get some popcorn in 🍿

 

[AuroraSaab]

It's right there - you admit that now - but now you're saying it didn't mean what it says. There are no other conditions other than precocious puberty or gender distress for which puberty blockers are given to children, so what else would you be talking about?

Suggesting that because pb's are given for a different condition - where Cass evidence standards aren't required - means they should be given to kids at gender clinics is a very poor argument.