Gender again. Sorry!

[monkers]

It's right there - you admit that now - but now you're saying it didn't mean what it says. There are no other conditions other than precocious puberty or gender distress for which puberty blockers are given to children, so what else would you be talking about?

Suggesting that because pb's are given for a different condition - where Cass evidence standards aren't required - means they should be given to kids at gender clinics is a very poor argument.

The ones mentioned by the experts in the QA session in Parliament for a start. If you had read it, you'd know.

 

[AuroraSaab]

You could enlighten us with the page references to their other use in children surely if it's so obvious. The discussion on here was about puberty blockers in children not about other illnesses in adults that require GnRH variants, such as prostate cancer.

 

[multitool]

She's not wrong

 

[classic33]

Why on earth would I be bringing up a post from 2023? It's your mate, in post #16084, a few pages back from this very one, who reintroduced the (poor) argument that giving pb's for other conditions means you can give them for gender issues.

Why you brought it back only you can know. It's something you keep on doing, bringing up old points made. Maybe in the hope they're forgotten about.

 

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1898106126656585778?t=zaAc96xUwZko13vehXHssA&s=19

 

[AuroraSaab]

View attachment 7511

She's not wrong

Odd that you choose somebody as unhinged as India Willoughby to support your argument. Regularly posts ranting videos from their car, spends their life trolling J K Rolling in a desperate attempt to stay relevant, thinks we should build a barrier across the Channel to keep the immigrants out..... .

Hardly an example of having your shoot together. Just another bitter and aggressive man determined to be in women's spaces.

When you look through this thread it's not me who's 'permanently aggressive and nasty' either.

 

[monkers]

Odd that you choose somebody as unhinged as India Willoughby to support your argument. Regularly posts ranting videos from their car, spends their life trolling J K Rolling in a desperate attempt to stay relevant, thinks we should build a barrier across the Channel to keep the immigrants out..... .

Hardly an example of having your shoot together. Just another bitter and aggressive man determined to be in women's spaces.

When you look through this thread it's not me who's 'permanently aggressive and nasty' either.

Oh it is, and you've just provided another example of it.

 

[CXRAndy]

IW is a complete nutjob

But the plan about a barrier across the channel. That idea could float

 

[AndyRM]

I suspect you probably find it galling that she has to live under the protection of the CTC meaning valuable police resources are squandered?

 

[CXRAndy]

I suspect you probably find it galling that she has to live under the protection of the CTC meaning valuable police resources are squandered?

No surprise there. The least he could do, would be a drag show whilst surrounded by the MET

 

[AndyRM]

As ever your ignorance knows no bounds.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Oh it is, and you've just provided another example of it.

Have I? I think the people having regular histrionic meltdowns and using foul language are the ones who look aggressive and nasty. It exposes transactivism for the aggressive men's rights movement that it is; full of misogynistic men who use it as an opportunity to unleash on women or who are angry that they can never be what they desire. The more the public see of it, the less they like it.

 

[CXRAndy]

This is the level of craziness the world has fallen into


View: https://x.com/TaraBull808/status/1898403339693638112?t=LVujhrlUC60Hq2xXOlUBbA&s=19

 

[monkers]

IW is a complete nutjob

But the plan about a barrier across the channel. That idea could float

Are you dissatisfied with the moat?

 

[monkers]

Have I? I think the people having regular histrionic meltdowns and using foul language are the ones who look aggressive and nasty. It exposes transactivism for the aggressive men's rights movement that it is; full of misogynistic men who use it as an opportunity to unleash on women or who are angry that they can never be what they desire. The more the public see of it, the less they like it.

View attachment 7514

The absolute truth is that you are just a vile c.unt. That is my protected philosophical belief and I'm as free to state it as you believe you are call call trans women men, if you are foolish enough to believe that a philosophical belief allows you to abuse and harass others without consequence.

I'm just treating you the way that you feel entitled to treat others.

While I'm speaking my truth, I absolutely hate that word, but my feelings for you are such that it the only word that feels apt.