monkers
Legendary Member
Why would they care about the Cass report which was commissioned solely for the use of the NHS England?
They are far more likely to be overriding the executive orders because they are not legal and because there will be great pressure from the pharmaceutical companies and insurers who make a lot of money from giving people drugs.
You make very fair points Ian. Cass has given golden fodder to bigots. Cass is not a paediatric endocrinologist. Her speciality is or was as a consultant of neuro-disability.
This is not a subject that can be reduced to the length of post that we might make here, and I have written about this before in some detail in the mists of time.
The lack of ''quality'' evidence relates to to the type of clinical research that can be carried out. However it has to be understood that research has to be carried out within ethical guidance. When it comes to research into puberty blockers a grade 1 study is impossible because it can not meet ethical standards. Therefore Cass sets out an impossible task. In other areas of medicine, where a grade 1 study, ie one with a double blind study compared with a control group using a significant number of subjects is impossible, a different approach is taken such as a longitudinal study, but that take many years.
It's a long read, but here is a document worth the effort. It is the oral evidence of consultant endocrinologist answering questions at the Women and Equalities Committee in Parliament. It reiterates the points I have previously made regarding the contest between ethical standards and standard research methodology in regard to puberty blockers, but does so much more eloquently.
https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15271/default/