Gender again. Sorry!

[monkers]

No I didn't, you have some form of inferiority complex.

Actually you are right. The error is mine.

 

[classic33]

I'm not. That you continually misunderstand the arguments is your problem.

If you're talking about unisex 3rd spaces, then as long as women also have a single sex option it is up to them if they then choose to use unisex spaces.

The only misunderstanding is on your part. Whether this is deliberate or not is another question. You've said that men should be willing to accept people you keep on claiming are men into mens spaces. And, that we should be willing to accept them, with no problems. Just check your own posting history for the proof.

You've done it again, diverted the question by introducing something that wasn't asked about. Is this because you can't answer the questions, without showing what you've already said. Showing that you're at odds with yourself because you only wish to pursue the one side that suits your requirements.

 

[monkers]

CXRAndy said

Good for you. You're still a gnat on the arse end of a tiny forum acting high and snooty. Feeling superior now. Can't even afford a bus fair. Do you rent a small flat too

also

you have some form of inferiority complex.

I mean, I try to be the person you demand that I am to be, but the commands are so conflicting. It's almost as if you don't know the contents of your own 'mind' - I use that word advisedly.

 

[AuroraSaab]

You've said that men should be willing to accept people you keep on claiming are men into mens spaces. And, that we should be willing to accept them, with no problems. Just check your own posting history for the proof.

No, I haven't. I have said that it's up to men whether they accept trans identifying women in their spaces. If you want them there that's up to you and other men.

You are endlessly fixated on an argument you either can't grasp or are wilfully misconstruing.

 

[monkers]

No, I haven't. I have said that it's up to men whether they accept trans identifying women in their spaces. If you want them there that's up to you and other men.

You are endlessly fixated on an argument you either can't grasp or are wilfully misconstruing.

Falkner thinks that she now gets to decide on your behalf, and you'll be cool with that. But don't pretend that this is democracy.

 

[classic33]

No, I haven't. I have said that it's up to men whether they accept trans identifying women in their spaces. If you want them there that's up to you and other men.

You are endlessly fixated on an argument you either can't grasp or are wilfully misconstruing.

Was it not yourself that said there's no reason why transmen couldn't use mens facilities. Your reasoning being that they wouldn't be dangerous or an invasion of privacy to anyone in there, young boys included.

You've convinced yourself that women are not a threat to anyone. Including other younger people.

 

[CXRAndy]

You've convinced yourself that women are not a threat to anyone. Including other younger people

Women and girls commit very little sexual crimes

 

[AuroraSaab]

No, I've said men should decide if they want trans identifying women in their spaces. They obviously aren't the danger to men or boys that men in women's spaces are to women and girls though.

 

[CXRAndy]

World boxing have announced mandatory testing for both male and females if they want to compete

 

[monkers]

Women and girls commit very little sexual crimes

But many more cis women are in prison for sexual offences than trans women. Before you reply, just remember the presented evidence.

 

[classic33]

No, I've said men should decide if they want trans identifying women in their spaces. They obviously aren't the danger to men or boys that men in women's spaces are to women and girls though.

Changing your stance, to suit yourself, is nothing new. You can't change what you have said though.

And, as you're fond of pointing out, you can always google.

 

[AuroraSaab]

But many more cis women are in prison for sexual offences than trans women. Before you reply, just remember the presented evidence.

Pro rata trans identifying men are overrepresented in sexual offending statistics.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Changing your stance, to suit yourself, is nothing new. You can't change what you have said though.

And, as you're fond of pointing out, you can always google.

Why don't you do us all a favour and post quotes of where I've said what you've claimed. You seem completely obsessed by something you claim but you never provide evidence of. It's getting a bit bizarre.

 

[classic33]

Why don't you do us all a favour and post quotes of where I've said what you've claimed. You seem completely obsessed by something you claim but you never provide evidence of. It's getting a bit bizarre.

Why is something you're fond of telling others to do beyond your capabilities.

 

[monkers]

Pro rata trans identifying men are overrepresented in sexual offending statistics.

The evidence says you must be wrong. You've seen the evidence. You are pretending that your inventions are true. By all means have your own opinions, but don't think for a minute your inventions are worthy of respect.

We don't have evidence from the prison service that there is even one trans woman in prison in England and Wales for offences against cis women.