Gender again. Sorry!

[monkers]

£18k you say, now if I had could do a few less hours I might be tempted

You could just do a few hours less on here to accommodate it.

 

[CXRAndy]

It's not derogatory and it's not misogynistic

I don't call people cis

So why don't you use it then?

It is derogatory to women

 

[CXRAndy]

You could just do a few hours less on here to accommodate it.

If you send me some of your other properties rent, to top up my income, I'll consider it

 

[monkers]

So why don't you use it then?

It is derogatory to women

Fully paid up virtue signalling PIMOB member.

Oh cis man, cis man, you're a cis man.

 

[CXRAndy]

Tranny, Tranny, Tranny

Allegedly 🤣

 

[monkers]

Tranny, Tranny, Tranny

Allegedly 🤣

Utter bell end, and not allegedly.

 

[CXRAndy]

Utter bell end, and not allegedly.

So are you saying you're a trans person.? I don't know which sex you're claiming to be

 

[monkers]

So are you saying you're a trans person.? I don't know which sex you're claiming to be

I'm actually addressing your status as an utter bell end - not alleged - blatantly true.

Just to make sure you are getting the message - under the law a 'trans' woman with a GRC is not even transgender under the law made by parliament twice, she is a 'woman'.

Solicitor General Vera Baird - later Dame Vera Baird - addressed the question in 2009. This went into the evidence provided to parliament before voting on the Equality Bill.

Vera Baird: She is a woman now for all purposes, not a transgender person, a woman.

Q76 Dr Harris: Right.

Vera Baird: That is the point of the certificate, is it not, to make it clear beyond doubt and that is where all her rights come from.

Q77 Dr Harris: So what you are saying is someone with a certificate does not fall within the protected ground and, therefore, exceptions on that protected ground—

Vera Baird: (interrupting) Will fall within the protected ground of sex.

 

[CXRAndy]

I'm actually addressing your status as an utter bell end - not alleged - blatantly true.

Just to make sure you are getting the message - under the law a 'trans' woman with a GRC is not even transgender under the law made by parliament twice, she is a 'woman'.

Solicitor General Vera Baird - later Dame Vera Baird - addressed the question in 2009. This went into the evidence provided to parliament.

You'll have to help me here, with me being a bit thick all.

So you're a trans identifying male with a GRC. Therefore you're classified as a 'woman' in law

 

[monkers]

You'll have to help me here, with me being a bit thick all.

So you're a trans identifying male with a GRC. Therefore you're classified as a 'woman' in law

You are more than a bit thick if you think that is what I said.

 

[CXRAndy]

It reads to me that way, what difference does it make to your status?

 

[monkers]

It reads to me that way, what difference does it make to your status?

Reading involves comprehension, not just the ability to parrot the words.

What you are being told is that women with a trans history, hence 'trans women' are women under the law. Women who are not trans women are cis women, since that is all it means. There is nothing derogatory about the terms cis and trans unless and until a bigot starts to use them in such a way as to mean them an insult. So that would be you then.

 

[CXRAndy]

No I'm just clarifying your status, surely you're not embarrassed by being trans, if that's what you are?

 

[monkers]

No I'm just clarifying your status, surely you're not embarrassed by being trans, if that's what you are?

Old British principle - mind your own! Repeated questioning is harassment.

 

[classic33]

Stop appropriating the medical conditions found in 0.02% of the population as way of getting men who don't have them into women's spaces.

Why then are you so concerned about getting people you class as women into mens spaces then?
You're using the same argument both ways, as and when it suits you. If you're being serious about "using the spaces relevant to your birth sex", you'd not be shouting for those people you see as women to be using spaces that aren't appropriate to their birth sex. After all when the thrust of your argument is supposed to be on safety, because "all men are dangerous", why would you want to force women to use an area you've claimed is unsafe?