AndyRM
Elder Goth
Your defence of the indefensible is absolutely fycking astonishing to me.
Yes, because that's exactly what I've done. Get a grip.
Your defence of the indefensible is absolutely fycking astonishing to me.
We don't allow people to voluntarily have other non essential surgery, never mind encourage it as a cure for mental health issues. I would actually dispute that it's 'voluntary' in the sense that these kids and young people are fed a lie that it will cure their unhappiness and, in the US at least, are approved for surgery with little exploration of alternative treatments.
Unfortunately, those surgeons responsible will simply fade away quietly because US laws and the statute of limitations mean it's very difficult to hold them to account.
The contentious bit is whether it should be offered at all. If someone asks to have a healthy leg amputated that request will not be completed. The person will be referred for mental health support. Many would argue that surgical alteration of the body to support the concept of gender transition is no different.It's anecdotal I know, but nobody I know has undertaken any major transitional surgery lightly.
The contentious bit is whether it should be offered at all. If someone asks to have a healthy leg amputated that request will not be completed. The person will be referred for mental health support. Many would argue that surgical alteration of the body to support the concept of gender transition is no different.
The argument for the difference in treatment is usually about suicidal ideation, but I remain unconvinced that these operations should be offered. I'm still on the side of the fence that says we should be treating gender dysphoria as a mental illness rather than a natural biological state of being.
That said, I'm very much aware that being gay used to be treated as a mental illness whereas we now know it is a natural state of being. It requires no treatment however, which is the key difference. Who you are as you is great, whoever you are and whatever you like. Once it starts requiring surgery and medication, it isn't about you being you anymore. It's about you *not* being you IMHO.
Already been mentioned, two years ago.We don't allow people to voluntarily have other non essential surgery, never mind encourage it as a cure for mental health issues. I would actually dispute that it's 'voluntary' in the sense that these kids and young people are fed a lie that it will cure their unhappiness and, in the US at least, are approved for surgery with little exploration of alternative treatments.
Unfortunately, those surgeons responsible will simply fade away quietly because US laws and the statute of limitations mean it's very difficult to hold them to account.
The there's liposuction on the NHS.
And now "big pharma" are getting in on the latest idea, weight loss medication.Seems it is, however "Liposuction carried out for cosmetic reasons is not normally available on the NHS."
https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/cosmetic-surgery/liposuction/#:~:text=Liposuction carried out for cosmetic,in the arms and legs
And from near the bottom of that page
"Occasionally, people who have liposuction find the desired effect was not achieved and feel they need another operation."
But prescriptions are aimed at people with significant obesity and multiple co-morbidities as it will help them to reduce weight and thus the potential health burden on the NHS. On prescription, it is a medical treatment, not a vanity treatment.And now "big pharma" are getting in on the latest idea, weight loss medication.
Adverts appear aimed at women at present.
They're available without prescription, legally in the UK, and being marketed as such.But prescriptions are aimed at people with significant obesity and multiple co-morbidities as it will help them to reduce weight and thus the potential health burden on the NHS. On prescription, it is a medical treatment, not a vanity treatment.
So is a saw and tourniquet.They're available without prescription, legally in the UK
But she has confirmed that she is biologically more male than female, which I don't think she has done before.Mixed news from Caster Semenya's ongoing legal battle:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/articles/c7vr04v3vpdo
Macron's partner dropped case of defamation against women who claimed she's a man.
Easy to prove, mouth swab![]()
No she didn't. They were found guilty of libel and ordered to pay 13000 euro. However the appeal court ruled that they had "made the mistake in good faith" - presumably they felt these women were just stupid and gullible rather than trying to libel the PMs wife.Macron's partner dropped case of defamation against women who claimed she's a man.