So I didn't write the phrase 'floppy penises' then.
Do you think 'flacid little chappy' is better? You belittled sexual assault when you said you supposed it would technically be rape if you ''f
orce another person to take the flacid little chappy into their mouth" as though such an assault wouldn't be traumatic for anybody, male or female.
To give better context to what I did write (post 1000), I wrote a serious piece about the effects of female hormones on the genitals of trans women.
I went on to ridicule the idea (and your ongoing statements) that trans women who have spent time on a hormone regime remain potential rapists.
You don't have to be on cross sex hormones to be considered a transwoman. It's enough just to say you are a transwoman remember, because 'people are who they say they are'. Also there are plenty of males who pose a risk to women and girls (and boys) who do not have the capacity to have penetrative sex. But again, as far as you're concerned we have to set the threshold at 'raped with a penis' before it becomes something women should be concerning themselves with. The concepts of dignity and privacy don't seem to concern you. Nobody thinks 10 year old boys are rapists but we separate school kids in changing rooms and showers because we know both sexes are entitled to privacy and dignity.
This is the basis of the alarm that you attempt to whip up that has no validation in biological science - the lack of functioning equipment and the lack of libido render the idea ridiculous.
And it's ridiculous that you imagine being impotent somehow eradicates all risk, or all discomfort, that women and girls have with having male bodies in single sex spaces. If that's the criteria we should admit any man with prostate trouble, any elderly man, or any man who has lost erectile function through accident or disease.
'Do you mind if I use the women's showers? It's fine because I have erectile dysfunction'.
There is a piece in the Irish Times reporting Damian Hinds statement that there are just six trans women in the female prison estate in England and Wales. He has also reported that there have been no incidents of assault or sexual assault made by trans women while in prison in the last few years. Although the dates he is referencing in the piece are somewhat vague, I guess he is saying since the system failure that put Karen White in with others without risk assessment having taken place.
If one remembers the levels of reported violence between women in women's prisons, we can see that women pose a much greater threat to other prisoners than trans women currently in women's prisons in England & Wales.
Again, setting the bar at sexual or physical assault shows a blatant disregard for what you think women should have to tolerate in order to validate the feelings of men.
'Women sometimes assault other women' is not an argument for introducing men to the mix.