Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

multitool

Guest
It's interesting even before you consider trans identity. Insistence on the same strict definition in all contexts runs the risk of diminishing the experience of a lot of cis people.

Agreed. The terms are heavily value-laden. They don't just refer to the biological sex of the parent.
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
The struggle is real.

Screenshot_20230316-103313_Google.jpg
 
It's interesting even before you consider trans identity. Insistence on the same strict definition in all contexts runs the risk of diminishing the experience of a lot of cis people.

Language has always evolved, the criticism on the evolving of language is nothing new either.
What is new is that we apparently don't really rely on science anymore, we see that both in the gender an the climate debate, it start to become more of a fight between who is the most connected/best in harrasement/etc. instead of real arguments as this topic also clearly shows.
Transgenders are more used as a stick to hit with than people genuinely acting on behalf of their interest. Same with children being ''educated'' about gender when it's just no longer a neutral stance. That is an issue, an easy to understand issue like i explained before just change the topic instead of not neutral education about ''gender'' make it not neutral education about ''nazism''(the hitler style) and magickly everyone understands why it is so wrong.
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Language has always evolved, the criticism on the evolving of language is nothing new either.
What is new is that we apparently don't really rely on science anymore, we see that both in the gender an the climate debate, it start to become more of a fight between who is the most connected/best in harrasement/etc. instead of real arguments as this topic also clearly shows.
Transgenders are more used as a stick to hit with than people genuinely acting on behalf of their interest. Same with children being ''educated'' about gender when it's just no longer a neutral stance. That is an issue, an easy to understand issue like i explained before just change the topic instead of not neutral education about ''gender'' make it not neutral education about ''nazism''(the hitler style) and magickly everyone understands why it is so wrong.

I mean it isn't, and I don't.
 
India Willoughby thinks we should build a fence to stop boats in the Channel:

'India said: 'Thank God for Nigel Farage! I’ll say it. The fact the French are escorting them over is awful. We’ve got Brexit and we’re leaving the EU. We should take control. I think it’s £100million we’ve spent on this problem. I’d go down the Trump route".'
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...-government-barbed-wire-fence-like-Trump.html

India Willoughby also thinks transwomen are women. So everybody else who thinks transwomen are women thinks the same as Willoughby about Channel arrivals. That's how it works, isn't it?

Screenshot_20230316_211623_Chrome.jpg
 
These people also think transwomen are women.

So everybody who thinks transwomen are women shares these sentiments.

That's how it works, isn't it?

img_8765-3.jpg


img_4709-3.png
 
D

Deleted member 121

Guest
India Willoughby thinks we should build a fence to stop boats in the Channel:

'India said: 'Thank God for Nigel Farage! I’ll say it. The fact the French are escorting them over is awful. We’ve got Brexit and we’re leaving the EU. We should take control. I think it’s £100million we’ve spent on this problem. I’d go down the Trump route".'
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...-government-barbed-wire-fence-like-Trump.html

India Willoughby also thinks transwomen are women. So everybody else who thinks transwomen are women thinks the same as Willoughby about Channel arrivals. That's how it works, isn't it?

View attachment 3358

I like her about as much as i like earwigs.
 
These are the rules, Classic. As set by your mate. If you even vaguely agree with somebody on one issue, you agree with them on everything.

If an Italian politician is an 'ally of gender critical feminism' (I've no idea if they are but we'll have to take his word for it I expect), then all gender critical feminists must also want to stop gay couples registering their children.

The logical end of this is that if you think transwomen are women, you personally must agree with every crappy thing transactivists say, including dodgy political views and violent threats.

It might be a bit unfortunate that you find yourself lumped together with people who want to rape and murder J K Rowling, but that's how guilt by association works, I'm afraid.
 
That's how it works apparently, Ian. Agree with one thing vaguely, you agree with everything. Because loosely affiliated groups of individuals like feminists are actually just one huge hive mind, you see.

I bet you like motorways, don't you? Thought so. Just like Hitler.
 

multitool

Guest
Looks like Aurora has been trawling the Daily Mail from 2 years ago, and twitter from 5 years ago.

Desperate, desperate stuff :whistle:
 
Top Bottom