Good job noone is doing that then. Preventing women from meeting to discuss things that concern them is rather authoritarian though.
What human rights do trans people not have? What you demand are that privileges are given to one group of people over and above what we grant to others in the same group, ie. that transwomen shouldn't be subject to the regulations that exclude other men.
I am not demanding anything thanks. I'm commenting on a forum. My life as a woman is not affected by the rights of trans people, there is no contest. I've already told you my 'legitimate concern' which is that I sense a negative affect on me if the EqA is rewritten to define sex as biological sex - though how they will do that I don't know, because the people who keep asking 'what a woman is' seem incapable of answering that question themselves.
Even the Commission with a biased government appointee in the chair has warned the government that the proposal looks unworkable, but to listen to Sunak et al they seem determine to press ahead. The previous GEs conducted on a boast of getting Brexit done (it still isn't) and now 30p Lee is saying that the Tories plan to fight the next GE election with sorting out trans people in the next.
Meanwhile millions of children starve, key workers are having to use food banks, homelessness and rough sleeping are on the increase, the economy is failing, the NHS is in crisis, but the big push to negatively impact trans people because some of them have a uretha that's maybe a bit longer than those of ciswomen. First world problems eh, the fear that a trans woman will want to play a game of my uretha is longer than yours in a public loo. It's nonsense, but this failing regime needs a distraction, so trans people get thrown under the bus.
Young people will vote against this anti-trans ideology if Sunak and Starmer try to make a fight of that. It's just the old farts that want this quarrel, just like they wanted Brexit, and look where that got us.
