D
You deliberately picked a graph without showing that the context was as a proportion of female arrests, not overall arrests.I shouldn't have to explain the numbers presented in simple bar graphs.
No, it showed that 55% of female arrests were for violence against the person. Women's arrests were only 18% of the total arrests for that crime.I said the data shows that more women are arrested than men for violence against the person.
You know very well that more men than women are prosecuted because more men than women are arrested.I have also said that men are four more times likely to face prosecution.
That doesn't prove that women are less violent. It proves that the system is biased in favour of women.
This stuff isn't hard to understand.
You've previously stated that it isn't "all men"It's men that are the risk. All men, however they identify. You are basically saying that men are dangerous so transwomen can't be in vulnerable spaces with them, but men aren't dangerous around women in their vulnerable spaces. Again this is just the argument that there is a special group of men who are different to other men. There isn't.
Secondly. Wtf? You think women are there to be human shields for men that don't want to be men? Women's single sex spaces aren't refuges for men, vulnerable or not. It's not women's job to protect men from other men. In all the years when gay men were being abused and assaulted they never pushed to be allowed in women's toilets.
It's also not only about safety, it's about privacy and dignity.
So which is it? For the record, so that we can clearly state once and for all which you feel it is, all, some or enough men.I think people should use the facilities intended for their sex. If you think transmen should use male facilities, that's up to you guys.
No, they are women. You can't change your sex. We all know that. All men aren't the problem, but enough men are a problem to make single sex spaces and services a necessity.
The 98% is the percentage of the 44% arrested for the offence.You deliberately picked a graph without showing that the context was as a proportion of female arrests, not overall arrests.
No, it showed that 55% of female arrests were for violence against the person. Women's arrests were only 18% of the total arrests for that crime.
You know very well that more men than women are prosecuted because more men than women are arrested.
Are you seriously saying the fact that 98% of sex offenders are men is because women comit the same number of sex crimes but aren't prosecuted?
You've previously stated that it isn't "all men"
So which is it? For the record, so that we can clearly state once and for all which you feel it is, all, some or enough men.
And it's not the first time your "view" on this has changed.
Not at all. It's the differing claims being made by one person.I think you're mixing up in prison and out of in the wider public
The 98% is the percentage of the 44% arrested for the offence.
Link to where the women's arrest figures are shown as 18% required.
Described as, but doesnt say who by."Among the international experts is Dr. Riita Kaltiala, chief psychiatrist at Tampere University gender clinic, author of numerous peer-reviewed articles on trans medicine, and Finland's top authority on pediatric gender care".
Actual experts with integrity, not US docs who make a lucrative living from gender medicine and removing teenagers breasts and genitalia.
Described as, but doesnt say who by.
Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala — described as “Finland’s leading expert on pediatric gender medicine and chief psychiatrist at its largest gender clinic”
Finland's leading expert who is now very annoyed that he is no longer needed as much as a leading expert since Finland went down the path of preferring what the WHO say and have adopted self-ID.
You deliberately picked a graph without showing that the context was as a proportion of female arrests, not overall arrests.
That was a short trip
My view hasn't changed. It's not all men, but it's enough men to be a problem.You've previously stated that it isn't "all men". So which is it? For the record, so that we can clearly state once and for all which you feel it is, all, some or enough men. And it's not the first time your "view" on this has changed.
Described as, but doesnt say who by.
Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala — described as “Finland’s leading expert on pediatric gender medicine and chief psychiatrist at its largest gender clinic”
Finland's leading expert who is now very annoyed that he is no longer needed as much as a leading expert since Finland went down the path of preferring what the WHO say and have adopted self-ID.
You presented it as women being responsible for 55% of violence arrests, when it's actually 18%. It was a deliberate misdirection.It's Home Office data. It shows the percentage of arrests by sex. Of females arrested for various offences, 55% of them were for violent offences against the person.
The argument is that all men are men. There are no special categories of men.Your argument is dishonest. You present that men are violent, that trans women are men are therefore violent. Therefore Caster Semenya should only use male toilets. This is monstrous.
No idea why you have misgendered her.