D
Deleted member 159
Guest
You've been put to the test too; you FAILED
Post your data, links to the sourced data, let it be peer reviewed and compared to other sources.
You've been put to the test too; you FAILED
That's also something that the data showed.
That of those women arrested for violence, they are not progressed to a caution or a charge. They get off.
On the other hand men are more likely to be cautioned or charged.
That was my thought. Perhaps women are more likely to be calmer and more remorseful confronted with a uniform whereas men want to fight the Copper and get arsey.
Attitude test and all that..
In 2021 there were something like 53k women arrested for violence against the person
means nothing unless against how many men were arrested, that could be a million men
In 2021 there were something like 53k women arrested for violence against the person.
53,000 divided 247000 = 0.21*100It was in the order of 247k.
That's also something that the data showed.
That of those women arrested for violence, they are not progressed to a caution or a charge. They get off.
On the other hand men are more likely to be cautioned or charged.
Post your data, links to the sourced data, let it be peer reviewed and compared to other sources.
The data links were given in the posts where I quoted data.
53,000 divided 247000 = 0.21*100
equals 21%
Didn't you contest the figure 18% ?
21% is close to 18% not the 45% you posted earlier
We need more data, not less data, otherwise commentary is futile.
We need less data, not more data, otherwise we drown in a sea of information, sometimes of dubious quality.
That's also something that the data showed.
That of those women arrested for violence, they are not progressed to a caution or a charge. They get off.
On the other hand men are more likely to be cautioned or charged.
Thank you. Hopefully Mudsticks will see that my strategy was as necessary as I say it was.
You've been put to the test too; you FAILED