Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Jeez, we've explained this several times over.

The 'in law' bit refers to the Gender Recognition Act 2004. If one can jump through the required medico-legal and practical hoops then you can have a birth certificate in your acquired gender. The UK was dragged kicking and screaming to pass that legislation because being unable to marry was a breach of people's Human Rights.

But this is not what transactivists want. It's not what Stonewall want. They want all the exemptions of the Equality Act to be removed. That means there are no longer any single sex spaces or services (for either sex) from which the other sex can be lawfully excluded. It's just self ID into those spaces and services, no GRC needed.

You seem to be under the impression that admittance to these spaces and services will be limited to those with a GRC who have somehow 'earned' the right to be in those spaces. That simply would not be the case if 'sex' is overwritten with 'gender' in UK law.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
But this is not what transactivists want. It's not what Stonewall want. They want all the exemptions of the Equality Act to be removed. That means there are no longer any single sex spaces or services (for either sex) from which the other sex can be lawfully excluded. It's just self ID into those spaces and services, no GRC needed.

You seem to be under the impression that admittance to these spaces and services will be limited to those with a GRC who have somehow 'earned' the right to be in those spaces. That simply would not be the case if 'sex' is overwritten with 'gender' in UK law.

There is no future plan to overwrite sex with gender in UK law. The EqA is not a standalone act, it reflects law made before it's introduction that has not been repealed or modified.
 

Pale Rider

Veteran
There is no future plan to overwrite sex with gender in UK law. The EqA is not a standalone act, it reflects law made before it's introduction that has not been repealed or modified.

Given your unfortunate experience with quoting the law in The Sun thread, this latest mixture of alleged fact and conjecture needs to be treated with extreme caution.

Or put simply, it's likely all cobblers.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
Given your unfortunate experience with quoting the law in The Sun thread, this latest mixture of alleged fact and conjecture needs to be treated with extreme caution.

Or put simply, it's likely all cobblers.

Whereas just about everything that leaks from your guttersnipe mouth needs to be treated with disdain. I've never quite recovered from you trying to defend your turn of phrase 'kiddyfiddlers' - that's pretty sick.
 

Pale Rider

Veteran
Whereas just about everything that leaks from your guttersnipe mouth needs to be treated with disdain. I've never quite recovered from you trying to defend your turn of phrase 'kiddyfiddlers' - that's pretty sick.

Widely used around newsrooms and the courts.

I'm sorry if it causes the maiden aunts on here to reach for the vapours, but celebrating differences is a lot wider topic than just gender.

Or could it be you only want to accept and celebrate differences of which you approve?

Surely not.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
One hour ago ...

trans rights are human rights.png
 
But this is not what transactivists want. It's not what Stonewall want. They want all the exemptions of the Equality Act to be removed. That means there are no longer any single sex spaces or services (for either sex) from which the other sex can be lawfully excluded. It's just self ID into those spaces and services, no GRC needed.

You seem to be under the impression that admittance to these spaces and services will be limited to those with a GRC who have somehow 'earned' the right to be in those spaces. That simply would not be the case if 'sex' is overwritten with 'gender' in UK law.
If it became the law you'd have to let it happen though.
 

multitool

Guest
Given your unfortunate experience with quoting the law in The Sun thread, this latest mixture of alleged fact and conjecture needs to be treated with extreme caution.

Or put simply, it's likely all cobblers.

You've yet to quote the law in The Sun thread. You've been asked, but seem evasive, becoming aggressive when matticus asks you explicitly.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
'Jailed male sex offenders are faking being transgender' according to other transwomen prisoners. This is 'You are who you say you are' in action. Who's to say that their gender isn't innate and they're in the wrong body?

https://web.archive.org/web/2023071...ale-sex-offenders-fake-trans-women-prisoners/

Yes for people who are not prisoners. Then for prisoners I've been saying RISK ASSESSMENT.

Do stop trying to twist my words you halfwit. How many more times?
 
The article isn't about risk assessment. It's about the notion of there being men who are genuinely transgender and men who are faking it. You tell us there is no diagnosis for being transgender and it's not a mental health issue. Regardless of any risk assessment, who are you to say these prisoners aren't transgender rather than men who are faking it? How can we tell?

Also, have a biscuit and a lie down. We are not at home to Mr. Rude.
 
D

Deleted member 159

Guest
If folk on the street can see what's happening with manipulation of the system, then there is a serious lack of authority control.

It's been said many times that male convicts would fake being trans. That's what has happened.

By extension, truly disturbed people will do the same in the wider population. Seen this is a mental condition, getting attention is a win win for these men
 

multitool

Guest
If folk on the street can see what's happening with manipulation of the system, then there is a serious lack of authority control.

It's been said many times that male convicts would fake being trans. That's what has happened.

By extension, truly disturbed people will do the same in the wider population. Seen this is a mental condition, getting attention is a win win for these men

Good honest man-down-the-pub common sense here
 
D

Deleted member 159

Guest
Good honest man-down-the-pub common sense here

We'll all these academics have done such a wonderful job upto press. Tavistock, prison service. Government. Money talks, so many private companies with fingers in the pie.
 
Top Bottom