Gender again. Sorry!

[Pale Rider]

Social clubs for the disabled shouldn't have to admit able bodied people.

No, but who is going to get the tea bags off the top shelf of the kitchen cupboard?

A harmless quip, but I am saddened and baffled by the harm to women some people on here advocate as a sacrifice on the high altar of trans rights.

 

[multitool]

No, but who is going to get the tea bags off the top shelf of the kitchen cupboard?

A harmless quip, but I am saddened and baffled by the harm to women some people on here advocate as a sacrifice on the high altar of trans rights.

But here's the thing, can you actually find any evidence of harm?

So far it's all theoretical.

 

[Deleted member 159]

Disabled toilets, we're back to them again, are unisex and are often the only one's that are left open for anyone to use. Men and women, able bodied and disabled.

That is the solution to trans.

The disabled toilets are a single room with a locking door.

Men's and women's public toilets are cubicles with lets face it the least amount of privacy afforded to them.

If you're not straight male or female, use the multi functional disabled toilets.

 

[Deleted member 159]

But here's the thing, can you actually find any evidence of harm?

So far it's all theoretical.

That's because you're coming from the stand point of trans are female, they're not.

When you approach it from that they are men, then safety becomes obvious, excluding them from women's spaces, logical.

 

[monkers]

Aurora destroyed he own by saying disabled toilets by saying 'well they are single-occupant only'. All toilets are. And beyond the cubicle door, that's the shared bit, ie public space. The law already makes that distinction, public space is not a private space. Handwashing is not protected as a private operation in law, nor does it need to be.

Wait for it .... she'll be back ... I'll be the one making demands.

 

[multitool]

That's because you're coming from the stand point of trans are female, they're not.

When you approach it from that they are men, then safety becomes obvious, excluding them from women's spaces, logical.

So if its obvious where is the evidence?

 

[Deleted member 159]

So if its obvious where is the evidence?

A quick Google search found this article in the Independent. Survey conducted by the Times.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...g-rooms-sunday-times-women-risk-a8519086.html

To quote

“These figures show that women and girls are more vulnerable in mixed changing rooms and there is a danger these places are becoming a magnet for sexual offenders,” says David Davies, MP for Monmouth.

“It simply doesn’t make sense to enable men to have greater access to women’s spaces. The reforms to gender recognition will grant that access.”

The ONS don't have the data , because the police don't record or keep the location on records

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/tran...ofinformationfoi/sexualassaultcases2016to2021

Unfortunately, police recorded crime data is not available for the questions you have asked

 

[monkers]

A quick Google search found this article in the Independent. Survey conducted by the Times.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...g-rooms-sunday-times-women-risk-a8519086.html

To quote

“These figures show that women and girls are more vulnerable in mixed changing rooms and there is a danger these places are becoming a magnet for sexual offenders,” says David Davies, MP for Monmouth.

“It simply doesn’t make sense to enable men to have greater access to women’s spaces. The reforms to gender recognition will grant that access.”

The ONS don't have the data , because the police don't record or keep the location on records

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/tran...ofinformationfoi/sexualassaultcases2016to2021

Unfortunately, police recorded crime data is not available for the questions you have asked

It's almost as if you and Aurora are the single embodiment of data abuse and abdication of reason in argument. Are you in fact, one and the same entity? Maybe just bots testing human powers of reason from the same source?

There is nothing in this so-called evidence that shows that trans women with a GRC (the cohort under attack here) are responsible for any attacks on women.

All we have is an acknowledgement that there's no data.

A report that mentions total numbers of complaints, but without filtering perpetrators into demographics, and the opinion of a known bigot that interrupts feminists while speaking by keep repeating 'what about men's rights, and interrupts BLM with 'what about white lives mattering'.

Find the harm that trans women are causing in women's toilets. If your world wide search finds 7 results in a population of 7 billion, you do know that means women are safe from attacks by trans women with a GRC. Right?

 

[Deleted member 159]

All we have is an acknowledgement that there's no data.

No data recorded on official statistics.

A bit like the Nazi's saying we don't have any recorded deaths of Jews.

There is nothing in this so-called evidence that shows that trans women with a GRC

That is a tiny proportion of the so called trans population. Vast majority never take drugs or have surgery to cut off their dicks or balls. So the article is very much relevant.

You just don't like it, so deny its relevance

 

[Deleted member 159]

There is nothing in this so-called evidence that shows that trans women with a GRC, wearing tartan skirt, orange hair and glasses.

Would you like to narrow down your victim's parameters, we might never be able to find such a perpetrator

 

[newfhouse]

If you're not straight male or female, use the multi functional disabled toilets.

Did someone once scare you by making eye contact at the urinal?

 

[Deleted member 159]

Did someone once scare you by making eye contact at the urinal?

Y'all harp on how such a small percentage are trans, then a simple solution is to give them access to disable toilets, or toilets of the the sex that they were born with.

What is wrong with that?

 

[monkers]

Y'all

The language used by a fruitcake who spends their time on American nutjob conspiracy websites.

 

[Deleted member 159]

The language used by a fruitcake who spends their time on American nutjob conspiracy websites.

Classic woke diversion tactic.

Stick to the point. The survey is relevant and obvious simple solution.

This protects biological women and girls in toilet/changing areas.

Sports is now sorted, males are banned from female events.

 

[multitool]