D
Deleted member 121
Guest
NACA historty
Are you stressed today?
NACA historty
Are you stressed today?
Once again you are saying nothing - apart from the usual snippy comments - so there's nothing to argue or discuss.
That you think me being often insulted is justified merely demonstrates your narrow and vindictive mind.
Hardly what I'd expect from a socially responsible 'we are all here for each other' leftie, which also makes you (yet another) hypocrite
Since this thread has become a thread about poor misunderstood Pale Rider my post is on topic and relevant.
Your last sentence is a totally meaningless cliche about lefties yet again.
Claud's stuff is largely garbage, there is no arguing with it because it doesn't say anything meaningful.
As regards being able to handle a counter argument, NACA historty, long before you landed, is very much against you.
In terms of having anything new to say about the gender 'debate' I'm very much inclined to agree.With every new contributor this thread gets worse and worse. I've got used to scanning and filtering out most of it but now I'm going to have to recalibrate.
From the Government guidance notes I posted earlier:-As I understand it, if the curriculum is not government agreed then it is unlawful.
Third party companies/charities are using/creating non conforming lesson material. Therefore is not sanctioned by the government. It must be illegal.
This is why when parents have been asking for classroom lesson plans for sex education, they are being fobbed off with 'its intellectual property ' of the provider.
Will be very interesting to see how this court action plays out
From the Government guidance notes I posted earlier:-
At the point at which schools consider it appropriate to teach their pupils about LGBT, they should ensure that this content is fully integrated into their programmes of study for this area of the curriculum rather than delivered as a stand-alone unit or lesson. Schools are free to determine how they do this.
Ask the government, it's their official guidance. Which act are we talking about?How does this comply with the education act.
This is where the lawyer said the education was deviating from national curriculum.
Let's see what happens.
It wasn't an argument, never mind a coherent one, just a comment.A stupid gif - is that your definition of a coherent argument?
You never disappoint.If you expect me not to ridicule such hypocrisy, I'm afraid I'm going to disappoint you again
With every new contributor this thread gets worse and worse. I've got used to scanning and filtering out most of it but now I'm going to have to recalibrate again.