AuroraSaab
Squire
He disputes many of the allegations - edited, wasn't his review, condemns non consenting sex with children ....
His main argument is that children can consent and his stated interest is in getting the age of consent lowered to 14. An excuse is that 14 year olds are already having sex and shouldn't be criminalised for this. I can't recall the last time 2 14 year olds were prosecuted. We all know the law is intended to protect children from adults. Those who say 'S/he looked 16... I didn't know they were 14...' would be able to say 'S/he looked 14... I didn't know they were 12...'.
There's no great demand from kids or the general public to change consent laws. It makes me uncomfortable that the people wanting it lowered are mostly middle aged men, under the guise of worrying about 14 year olds being prosecuted.
Tatchell should be free to make his case though, however much I dislike his views, as his views aren't illegal. I just wish police forces and so on would stop working with him and giving him our money.
His main argument is that children can consent and his stated interest is in getting the age of consent lowered to 14. An excuse is that 14 year olds are already having sex and shouldn't be criminalised for this. I can't recall the last time 2 14 year olds were prosecuted. We all know the law is intended to protect children from adults. Those who say 'S/he looked 16... I didn't know they were 14...' would be able to say 'S/he looked 14... I didn't know they were 12...'.
There's no great demand from kids or the general public to change consent laws. It makes me uncomfortable that the people wanting it lowered are mostly middle aged men, under the guise of worrying about 14 year olds being prosecuted.
Tatchell should be free to make his case though, however much I dislike his views, as his views aren't illegal. I just wish police forces and so on would stop working with him and giving him our money.
Last edited: