I see you're going down the 'I didn't call you a c*nt' route whereby if you deny it enough you think people will forget what you actually posted.
Did you miss the photo upthread of he adjusting a Proud Boy's bra-strap on stage?
Yes, we've seen that one and the Australian photo. Why do you condemn that but not violent transactivism?
I suspect Aurora's tactic is to try and squash discussion of Minshull's links to the far right by way of vicarious threat of litigation. It is, if nothing else, somewhat pathetic.
You are welcome to discuss her links to the far right. I've pointed out that others have withdrawn such allegations because they were likely libellous. She chooses to appear on the shows of right wing pundits and cooperate with conservative/right wing groups, others don't.
I'm more interested in why you think women shouldn't be allowed to gather in public to say things you don't like without intimidation or violence.
Bizarre too, given that Aurora is always at great pains to say how disinterested she is in Minshull, whilst leaping at the throat of anyone who so much as expresses a reservation.
I have no interest in her campaigns. I am interested in people - anybody - being able to hold public meetings that are within the law, whether I like what they say or not. Especially if those people are women, because aggressive and violent men have always sought to intimidate women into silence. The point of course is not to silence that one individual but to make others afraid to also speak out.