monkers
Shaman
Since the recent halt in many European countries of trans operations and drugs there hasn't been a marked increase in trans deaths
So those wanting medical procedures are doing it for vanity/personal gratification
Source please.
Since the recent halt in many European countries of trans operations and drugs there hasn't been a marked increase in trans deaths
So those wanting medical procedures are doing it for vanity/personal gratification
Since the recent halt in many European countries of trans operations and drugs there hasn't been a marked increase in trans deaths
So those wanting medical procedures are doing it for vanity/personal gratification
That's because biological women don't need to take very much of it. In higher quantities the EMA has something to say:-However you should note that domperidone (also a travel sickness drug) is not on the list of medications that pregnant or breastfeeding women should avoid.
https://www.nhs.uk/medicines/domper...eding-and-fertility-while-taking-domperidone/
Although there is a study here on a single transwoman:Use of domperidone for lactation is off licence and not without risk. In April 2014, the European Medicines Agency issued a warning about its use, highlighting serious, but rare, adverse effects including prolongation of the QT interval, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death.3 These risks need to be balanced against the fact that not prescribing domperidone could lead to the unintentional loss of the significant benefits of breastfeeding to mother and child.
Use of domperidone for lactation is off licence and not without risk. In April 2014, the European Medicines Agency issued a warning about its use, highlighting serious, but rare, adverse effects including prolongation of the QT interval, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death.3 These risks need to be balanced against the fact that not prescribing domperidone could lead to the unintentional loss of the significant benefits of breastfeeding to mother and child.
From the same pieceThank you for this. I'm pleased to see you acknowledging that risks are balanced on a benefit to risk basis rather than being guaranteed risk free. This also strongly suggests that the claim of zero research made by another poster is incorrect.
Your definition of vanity/personal gratification clearly differs from my own.
Dysmorphia is a very real and challenging thing which takes a lot to overcome but in some cases is insurmountable.
I've suffered from it, still do sometimes, and it's not a feeling I'd wish on anyone, or judge anyone wishing to resolve it.

OK that's the source of the person you are parroting, where is the source of data?

Off you go and find it now. Many countries and clinicians mentioned
You claim to be highly educated and research specialist![]()
No - that's from the risk page about giving it to biological women. There has been research on giving it to biological women in small doses, not to biological men in large doses.Thank you for this. I'm pleased to see you acknowledging that risks are balanced on a benefit to risk basis rather than being guaranteed risk free. This also strongly suggests that the claim of zero research made by another poster is incorrect.
I do not claim to be highly educated. I just think you sound thick. I do not claim to be a research specialist, I just find stuff on google within a few seconds that proves that you are just talking conspiracy theory nonsense - not that you are alone on the internet, there are all kinds of fruitloops.
Do you have the data or not?
No - that's from the risk page about giving it to biological women. There has been research on giving it to biological women in small doses, not to biological men in large doses.
I'm pointing you to the psychiatrist who is a specialist in the field children mental health
Dr Miriam Grossman
I'm sure you can find her research on Google in a few seconds.
Disprove her position