AuroraSaab
Squire
If only there were some clue that we could ascertain from the paedophile male farmers, the paedophile men who say they are women, and the paedophile male priests, that might help us plan future safeguarding.
If only there were some clue that we could ascertain from the paedophile male farmers, the paedophile men who say they are women, and the paedophile male priests, that might help us plan future safeguarding.
So we're back to trans people being paedos?
F*cking hell this thread is bleak.
What about trans men?The unevidenced pretence that transwomen are somehow completely different from other men is what’s key.
Because if not it's just a demand that some men are treated differently from others, and we all know that makes no sense.
Don't forget the female nuns, and the female teachers.If only there were some clue that we could ascertain from the paedophile male farmers, the paedophile men who say they are women, and the paedophile male priests, that might help us plan future safeguarding.
No, they don't. Because they are biological women.What about trans men?
They do after all they fit into your "all men" group.
No, they don't. Because they are biological women.
The logic here is that if transwomen have the same pattern of offending as men then transmen will have the same pattern of offending as women.
The suggestion is that hormone treatment and possible surgery isn't sufficient to change offending behaviour.
Of course, what keeps being overlooked here (as I have pointed out before) is that if any man can identify as a woman then it is *just possible* that some people who *Say* that they are transwomen are not in fact transwomen but are just perverted predators using it to gain access to women, or to be treated differently. There does seem to be a remarkable pattern of men who decide they are women after being convicted of serious crimes, or during the trial process.
On the one hand people are told that the problem is that TERFS ignore people who have lived experience of being trans, or knowing / working with trans people, going through the transition process etc cos prejudice, phobia etc, but on the other hand it's fine to ignore/"cancel" people like JK Rowling who have been through the "escaping domestic violence via a refuge" process. Their lived experience of not wanting or having concerns about transwomen having access to women's refuges doesn't count for some reason.
The absurdity of it all tends to be brough out in things like the grovelling reviews of Hogwarts Legacy, where games sites either didn't review the game, or posted long paragraphs about how the game was dissociated from it's creator because of her views which were clearly abhorrent and which she shouldn't be allowed to have. Despite all the gnashing and wailing of teeth, Hogwarts Legacy was the best selling game of 2023 and is in the top 50 best selling games of all time. So clearly most people couldn't give a flying monkeys about JK Rowling commenting on issues that she feels strongly about despite their being a small cadre of individuals willing to harass the studio, Rowling and gamers streaming on twitch.
The issue isn't and has never been that all transwomen are paedos. The issue is that not all transwomen are equal, and it seems likely that without any safeguards, there are some men willing to take advantage.
The issue isn't and has never been that all transwomen are paedos. The issue is that not all transwomen are equal, and it seems likely that without any safeguards, there are some men willing to take advantage.
Can you explain why this isn't happening now, given that there are no safeguards.