icowden
Squire
You are being slightly ridiculous here. You do know that twitter is curated? Everyone else looking at your post sees a picture of Roxie Tickle underneath which is a picture of KJK.
Gender again. Sorry!
- Thread starter theclaud
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
icowden
Squire
You are being slightly ridiculous here. You do know that twitter is curated? Everyone else looking at your post sees a picture of Roxie Tickle underneath which is a picture of KJK. This is what everyone else is seeing:-
D
Deleted member 159
Guest
So it's true, these kids have multiple 'neurodevelopmental' conditions
Mental psychiatric assessment should have been conducted
D
Deleted member 159
Guest
The 388-page Cass Report concluded that the rationale for suppressing puberty in young children 'remains unclear', with 'weak evidence' on the impact such treatments have on children.
monkers
Legendary Member
How can you possibly know that?
What you mean is that you see a picture of RT. I posted a link to a Tweet using the tweet address. I've clicked on it now from three laptops in this household, all lead to KJK saying that she is not gender critical because she doesn't know what the word gender means, and that she knows that all women have a penis.
I do still have a Twitter account though I never use it other than to occasionally look at Tweets that are in links.
monkers
Legendary Member
Proof positive (as if it was needed) that you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
icowden
Squire
Educated guess given that everyone else is reporting seeing what I posted.
AuroraSaab
Squire
In the Roxy Tickle v Women's App case in Australia, Tickle's lawyer has apparently managed to inadvertently call his own client 'him' several times over in this session already. Whilst claiming that everybody thinks Roxy Tickle is a woman.
I think it's likely Tickle will win, simply because Australia is so far down the rabbit hole already with their laws but the fact that Tickle's own lawyer can't even stop misgendering his client shows how ridiculous it is.
I think it's likely Tickle will win, simply because Australia is so far down the rabbit hole already with their laws but the fact that Tickle's own lawyer can't even stop misgendering his client shows how ridiculous it is.
D
Deleted member 159
Guest
But DR Cass does, and she confirms my previous comments
Despite my '
I seem to be on the same page as the experts.
You don't like the fact a thicko was absolutely spot on.
AuroraSaab
Squire
Still reading about the Cass Report. What is astonishing is that the GIDS service refused to give Cass access to their records on 9,000 children. Cass could then find data about things like how many children had autism or other issues, interview parents and children, find out how many kids dropped out, assess whether there were positive or negative outcomes and so on. Unbelievable that they refused to make that data available.
multitool
Pharaoh
Oh look, it's my little stalker weirdo
monkers
Legendary Member
Everyone else? You mean Aurora? I haven't seen anyone else commenting.
monkers
Legendary Member
I agree with the self-descriptive part.
In the meantime research autism, and the difference between a psychiatrist and a psychologist.
bobzmyunkle
Senior Member
Everyone else is wrong, @monkers sees the real picture.
Don't flatter yourself, it's impossible to read the thread without coming across your efforts to slur everyone who disagrees with you.
To your credit you haven't called anyone Nazi for quite a while. Cue Toolzie 'I never called anyone a Nazi, you thick ...'
icowden
Squire
OK - quick poll...
Hands up all those who see the picture of Roxie Tickle in @monkers post here?
@multitool, @AndyRM , @classic33 can one of you confirm?
