multitool
Guest
By whom and where ?
Don't worry yourself with it, hun.
By whom and where ?
Angela Rayner is put on the spot by JKR
JK Rowling has agreed to meet Labour on the condition that Angela Rayner apologises for endorsing a charter that described two organisations, Woman’s Place and the LGB Alliance, as “hate groups”.
That's because the Terfs primary aim is to make trans people's lives unliveable. They'll dress it up with the usual "reasonable questions" crap, but that is what they want. Reasonable questions are being asked elsewhere, but not by people like Stock, Joyce, or Minshull.
Don't worry yourself with it, hun.
A little whiffy? Is that the best you can do?I'm not going to disregard what these nurses are saying, but I think there is something a little whiffy about the story.
That's because the Terfs primary aim is to make trans people's lives unliveable.
Why not leave it alone then?No, it's a noisy little sideshow.
What things has Kathleen Stock said that would make 'trans people's lives unliveable?'
Actual quotes from her, obviously.
She very much is if you actually read her articles. She's one of the most sensible and measured voices in the debate, but here you are nonsensically complaining about what she hasn't said. Again, let's see some examples.If you read my post I didn't comment on what Stock is saying. In effect I commented on what she is not saying. She isn't contributing to a moderate and respectful discussion.
Well here it is below. Seems sensible to me. Banning exploratory therapy for children (edit: and adults) who are body/gender dysphoric could lead them down a medical/surgical pathway for an issue which resolves itself with therapy and watchful waiting in many cases. Therapists may be pushed towards affirmation only and afraid of exploratory work in case of prosecution.But since you asked, her opposition to the conversion therapy ban is pretty damn awful.
Will you now? You'd be wrong. Let's hear your complaints about Helen Joyce then. She's an experienced journalist and I find what she says pretty sensible too. Let's hear what's so 'venal' about her.I grant you that she isn't as venal as the other two I cited, Minshull and Joyce, and I'll take your unwillingness to challenge me on them as a tacit agreement.
She very much is if you actually read her articles. She's one of the most sensible and measured voices in the debate,
but here you are nonsensically complaining about what she hasn't said. Again, let's see some examples.
Well here it is below. Seems sensible to me. Banning exploratory therapy for children who are body/gender dysphoric could lead them down a medical/surgical pathway for an issue which resolves itself with therapy and watchful waiting in many cases. Therapists may be pushed towards affirmation only and afraid of exploratory work in case of prosecution.
https://archive.ph/H0WJ3
Will you now? You'd be wrong. Let's hear your complaints about Helen Joyce then. She's an experienced journalist and I find what she says pretty sensible too. Let's hear what's so 'venal' about her.
KJ Keen is a popularist who has no philosophy or feminist theory behind what she does.
I would bet that you actually haven't a clue what Stock or Joyce have actually written.
Tenant just ruined his prospects telling a woman to shut up about trans.
Allegedly he's trans his kid