Gender again. Sorry!

[icowden]

Regulator says one thing, court says another ...

Not really. The Regulator said that you cannot suppress free speech and discussion when teaching the curriculum to year 7 pupils. The Courts said you cannot suppress free speech and discussion at University.

Both said the same thing.

 

[monkers]

Not really. The Regulator said that you cannot suppress free speech and discussion when teaching the curriculum to year 7 pupils. The Courts said you cannot suppress free speech and discussion at University.

Both said the same thing.

Unfortunately you are missing two obvious points in law here. I'll copy two paragraphs from the regulator and then I feel sure you'll spot them.

The OfS report marks the end of an inquiry that began more than three years ago. It was spawned by the case of Kathleen Stock, a philosophy professor who said she was forced out of the university in 2021 by a three-year campaign of bullying and character assassination.

The decision by the university regulator to punish Sussex comes after the previous Conservative government passed the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 to toughen laws around freedom of expression.

I foresee a legal challenge.

 

[icowden]

I foresee a legal challenge.

I'm not sure your fortune telling routine is going to pay off given that they said that in the article ;-)

The University of Sussex plans to legally challenge the OfS findings, vice-chancellor Prof Sasha Roseneil said.

 

[monkers]

I'm not sure your fortune telling routine is goin

OK I foresee at least two bases on which a legal challenge will be mounted.

 

[CXRAndy]

When Trumps say it, there's outrage


View: https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1904990127312482385?t=pbuSeCzg3Dfbgy-zM1kZ2A&s=19


When Professor Robert Winston tells the truth, never again invited onto question time


View: https://youtu.be/LGR_pNAdGqM?feature=shared

 

[CXRAndy]

Oh dear
Professor Alice Sullivan

Robust data about sex has been lost review concluded, sex offenders permitted to self identify rather than being recorded by their sex. Schools immediately change the status on their IT systems , usually without consulting parents

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/30/alice-sullivan-transgender-donald-trump-wes-streeting/

 

[CXRAndy]

No longer women's sporting event


View: https://x.com/piersmorgan/status/1908975730857586805?t=p8b93Qb1ACPfimQOauZ2PA&s=19

 

[AndyRM]

You get slaughtered at pool if you're not good enough.

Gender has f*ck all to do with it.

 

[CXRAndy]

You get slaughtered at pool if you're not good enough.

Gender has f*ck all to do with it.

Yes it does, more powerful cue strike from break-off, greater reach.

Yes it's a skill based game, but there is a power element, which can greatly improve win percentage

 

[AndyRM]

*Adds pool to the list*

 

[AuroraSaab]

Advantage or not, and there likely is, women are allowed their own stuff.

 

[AndyRM]

Advantage or not, and there likely is, women are allowed their own stuff.

There isn't. Pool is based on skill and focus, not strength or gender.

Of course women are "allowed their own stuff".

 

[AuroraSaab]

Great, so those 2 men can pop off back to the Men's competition and leave the women to their own stuff.

 

[AndyRM]

I'd put money on neither of you being able to name a single other female pool player before this final came to light. Must be pretty galling that trans players have made you give a sh!t about pool or pretend to know anything about how it's played.

I vaguely remember a "discussion" about snooker on here a while ago. Same story there though, there's no gender based advantage.

 

[CXRAndy]

Certainly reach in snooker 12' * 6' size tables.

Anyhow another poor girl kicked off her athletics squad to make way for a male


View: https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1909155329658564624?t=qKl33iLzoBvvA-8iPmzkqQ&s=19