Not being a native English speaker may excuse you for claiming the article you quote says something it doesn't. Doubling down on your claim can only be attributed to malicious intent and/or being a bit thick.
I never said it can justify anything, but you seem to be more of an idiot by insisting in using terrorist provided data. and still all of those people would probably been alive today if Hamas didn't attack on the 7 of October.
If you would actually read the article it says they are still planning to visit Isreal and that Isreali coorperation was ''adequate'' so the headline is somewhat misleading. It's not that the evidence isn't there it's just the UN who hasn't collected/viewed it
And now you change it around again i spelled it out for you an post back, done with this the link i posted said exactly what i said it said. That you can't cope with that is your problem.
if they IDF are terrorist is an opinion not a fact, (where Hamas is an international recognised terrorist organisation) but apart from that in this case there is a other party the half red cresent(arabic version of the red cross) that reports 54 killed and 120 injured as off yesterday morning. an whole difference with what the terrorist reported.
