Israel / Palestine

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pblakeney

Active Member
So the US is planning to supply aid via private firms. I can't say I'm particularly surprised but this is a terrible idea on many levels.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp92rlm300mo

Hardly surprising. They’ve got to monitise everything somehow.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
So the US is planning to supply aid via private firms. I can't say I'm particularly surprised but this is a terrible idea on many levels.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp92rlm300mo

Isn’t much of the aid (not just Gaza) already supplied by what are, in effect, private companies. Oxfam etc may be Charities in name, but, in practice they operate in a very similar way to a private company, complete with well remunerated CEO (none of this blood sucking shareholders of course).
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
Isn’t much of the aid (not just Gaza) already supplied by what are, in effect, private companies. Oxfam etc may be Charities in name, but, in practice they operate in a very similar way to a private company, complete with well remunerated CEO (none of this blood sucking shareholders of course).

Not really, no.
 

Psamathe

Senior Member
To me this really beggars belief and maybe highlights attitudes
UK Lawyers for Israel condemned over claim war may reduce obesity in Gaza
A UK-based advocacy group for Israel has been criticised for suggesting a reduction in obesity resulting from the war in Gaza may increase life expectancy there.

The comments by UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), which came amid warnings of impending famine in Gaza, were condemned as “sickening” by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC).

UKLFI’s patrons include the former supreme court judge John Dyson, the former Conservative leader Michael Howard and David Pannick KC, who has represented Boris Johnson and the late queen.
...
Ian
 

icowden

Squire

To be fair, it *is* true. It will also lower the number of school places, reduce teenage pregnancy. The crime rate will be right down. There will be zero asylum seekers and a very low crime rate.

The question is, will Reform see "bombing the shoot out of the country" as a bold new policy?
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
To be fair, it *is* true. It will also lower the number of school places, reduce teenage pregnancy. The crime rate will be right down. There will be zero asylum seekers and a very low crime rate.

The question is, will Reform see "bombing the shoot out of the country" as a bold new policy?

You're not wrong on any count. I just can't believe anyone would say that seriously. Bonkers.
 

Pblakeney

Active Member
To be fair, it *is* true. It will also lower the number of school places, reduce teenage pregnancy. The crime rate will be right down. There will be zero asylum seekers and a very low crime rate.

The question is, will Reform see "bombing the shoot out of the country" as a bold new policy?

Sounds like the perfect place for Reformers to escape this refugee filled country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Isn’t much of the aid (not just Gaza) already supplied by what are, in effect, private companies. Oxfam etc may be Charities in name, but, in practice they operate in a very similar way to a private company, complete with well remunerated CEO (none of this blood sucking shareholders of course).
The way they collect donations in the uk and europe certainly is, both in setup at the companies house as in ways they run them.

Well they think their corruption in aid now, just wait till you see the industrial scale it reaches now companies are going to be allowed to profit from it.
Normally i would absolutely agree however, if we step back a little and realize how charities in crisis area often have to work, being supported by an private military company might be the better option.

What happened in Gaza for example is that Hamas controlled all aid coming into Gaza and/or instead of supplying the civilian Palestinian population, it became only hamas supporting population and clean water? forget it they needed their rocket laucnhers. Unrwa's corruption exist(ed) out of supplying reports that imply they still supply it and they everythin is ok .(which it clearly isn't.)
A PMC could oversee and enforce correct distribution of humanitarian aid.
 

Ian H

Legendary Member
The way they collect donations in the uk and europe certainly is, both in setup at the companies house as in ways they run them.


Normally i would absolutely agree however, if we step back a little and realize how charities in crisis area often have to work, being supported by an private military company might be the better option.

What happened in Gaza for example is that Hamas controlled all aid coming into Gaza and/or instead of supplying the civilian Palestinian population, it became only hamas supporting population and clean water? forget it they needed their rocket laucnhers. Unrwa's corruption exist(ed) out of supplying reports that imply they still supply it and they everythin is ok .(which it clearly isn't.)
A PMC could oversee and enforce correct distribution of humanitarian aid.

And who was it worked to keep Hamas in power? (Clue: he's the Israeli PM).
 

briantrumpet

Well-Known Member
This looked like the game plan all along, as noted in the BR Cake Stop thread. Hamas played their allotted part in Netanyahu's plan. It's a case of Occam's Razor, methinks.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...op-this-horror-the-alternative-is-unthinkable

1746996519453.png
 
Top Bottom