A protest that doesn’t in some way disrupt is not a protest.
There’s no point if it doesn’t make people uncomfortable.
The fact that this even has to be pointed out, is deeply troubling..🙄
A protest that doesn’t in some way disrupt is not a protest.
There’s no point if it doesn’t make people uncomfortable.
The fact that this even has to be pointed out, is deeply troubling..🙄
A protest that doesn’t in some way disrupt is not a protest.
There’s no point if it doesn’t make people uncomfortable.
So, if we accept that:
how about defining the boundaries between "uncomfortable", "intimidating", "harassment" ?
Those are words the definition of which, are freely available in any dictionary..
And which are also legally defined.
Threatening users of medical facilities with harm is definitely all of the above.
Please remember some doctors have been murdered by anti abortion campaigners
This is not just people shouting, or waving placards.
A protest that doesn’t in some way disrupt is not a protest.
There’s no point if it doesn’t make people uncomfortable.
What?, in Scotland, or, even UK?
Murder is already against the law I believe.
I repeat, I don't support this particular set of protesters views, but, having only protests we approve of is just a trifle wrong, to me.