Random Daily Banter

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Rusty Nails

Country Member
To me there is nothing wrong with that extension. It does not block the light of other house/gardens too much or invade privacy, and the most important thing is the internal design and the pleasure the owners get out of it. They spend more time inside looking out than outside looking in, and I am not convinced their neighbours spend much time sitting in their gardens looking at the extension, especially those in the messy garden next door. If so they need to get a life.

We get far too concerned how a house looks and fits in with its neighbours in what is a bog standard neighbourhood of no particular architectural significance.
 
Same logic applies to cars and bikes doesn't it. It's one of the reasons that new Jaguar will sell like hot cakes. It's the best way of never having to see it.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Shaman
RJS would be proud of all this architectural banter. Actually, thanks to him I subscribe to several architectural accounts on Bluesky, and I do actually find it interesting to see what I like/don't like, and try to work out why. I don't like bland, and I'd rather people take risks... but sometimes you just go "Oh god, just no!"
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Shaman
Yay. Just what I need! I wonder if I can get them via Amazon.

qvbmjwomjvzue7wpr7ol3g5kdyjfvjbwn6dlhdwxvblte@jpeg.jpg

(Carlton Reid)
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Shaman
I wonder what date that advertisement is.
Cocaine was illegal in UK as early as 1920.

1880s I think.
 

matticus

Legendary Member
To me there is nothing wrong with that extension. It does not block the light of other house/gardens too much or invade privacy, and the most important thing is the internal design and the pleasure the owners get out of it. They spend more time inside looking out than outside looking in, and I am not convinced their neighbours spend much time sitting in their gardens looking at the extension, especially those in the messy garden next door. If so they need to get a life.

We get far too concerned how a house looks and fits in with its neighbours in what is a bog standard neighbourhood of no particular architectural significance.

I see your point, but people have to live in that " bog standard neighbourhood of no particular architectural significance", so I think they have some right to not have their views/environment ruined. All very subjective of course ...
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
I see your point, but people have to live in that " bog standard neighbourhood of no particular architectural significance", so I think they have some right to not have their views/environment ruined. All very subjective of course ...

Exactly.

Views/environment "ruined" is subjective. "Changed" less so, and there is usually no right to have no change.

I live in a fairly bog standard neighbourhood and in recent years 90% of the houses and bungalows (including ours and both next door neighbours) have been changed and extended significantly. I cannot say that any of them are aesthetically pleasing but they do not obstruct my light so, after some initial "oh I don't think much of that extension" comments between me and my wife, it hasn't impacted on us one iota and certainly not "ruined" anything.
 

Beebo

Guru
Why would anyone impersonate a rear admiral with a DSO medal? Walter Mitty characters fascinate me.

These high ranking officers all know each other, it would be so easy for someone to say yes I know him. But no one has.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgy42yjn1xo

The fake rear admiral has been fined £500. He was wearing a very eclectic selection of medals.

It’s illegal to wear any military uniform without his Majesty’s permission, under the Uniforms Act 1894.

that’s why the royal family get to wear nonsense uniforms without earning the right to do so.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c78e548p9nno
 
Top Bottom