Stevo 666
Veteran
Or any other part of Europe.
They come here because we are a now a food and money bank for anyone getting across the water.
Yep. Reducing the 'pull' factors is an important part of bringing the numbers down.
Or any other part of Europe.
They come here because we are a now a food and money bank for anyone getting across the water.
At least as much as the Tories. Partner in coalition at best.
I'm sure you could find outspoken "stupid" supporters of any political party. I agree but a sample of 1 isn't that representative.And yet people have argued that Reform supporters are not stupid.
It’s just such a dim argument.Seriously? That's your solution - that they should all stay in France? By that logic they should all stay in Iran and Pakistan where 90% of Afghan refugees reside. They don't magically appear in France,[/I]
FWIW, I think it's useful to remind younger people about its history, as the generation of people disfigured by their mothers taking it during pregnancy has all-but died out, and with it the experience of people of my/our age of seeing them and learning about how it happened (and how that changed medical testing practices).
This also applies to the polio vaccine and other vaccines. I remember growing up in the 70s that you would often see people in leg braces because of polio side effects. Younger people have not seen that, so it is easier to be taken by anti vax bölocks.
Quite so. Ditto seeing iron lung units for people *even older* than us.
https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/iron-lung
Cue the story of the hospital ward full of people with iron lungs. The bed nearest the door had a mysterious, worrying mortality rate. Eventually they discovered that the cleaner each morning would unplug that one to plug in her vacuum cleaner.
Yep. Reducing the 'pull' factors is an important part of bringing the numbers down.
We should be giving asylum to people whose lives are in danger - are you saying their lives are in danger in France? Clearly not, so coming to the UK is a choice.
Yep. Reducing the 'pull' factors is an important part of bringing the numbers down.
Fairly stringent? On what basis? The current level of immigration, both legal and illegal, would suggest otherwise.
One of the big pull factors for the refugees I know is the English language.
If you have to leave your country in a hurry, it's understandable if you choose to go to a place where you have at least a rudimentary understanding of the language.
I take reducing the pull factors as code for "treat them mean". I would argue for seeing refugees as a resource.
It’s just such a dim argument.
By this logic, once they land in Kent they should just stay in Kent. Why should other councils take any asylum seekers?