Riot!

[dutchguylivingintheuk]

What cultural factors did the court mention?

Ask home secratari Javid at the time : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46684638

Arguably abuse within the family is even worse - it's a gross breach of trust by those who should be protecting the victims, and who have the ability for greater control of them. The number of victims abused within the family is probably much greater too. I suppose the racist trope of brown men raping white women is much more exciting for people like you and the fans of the rapist-paedophile president.

Yes but as @AuroraSaab pointed out is has nothing to do with muslims rape gang that are protected by the state meaning police and social workers

Hilariously, despite finding herself holding a growing number of views that align with actual fascists, Aurora seems unable to recognise what that actually means.

The only reason she is going on about Pakistani grooming gangs again is because a sieg heiling fascist told her to.

(your reminder that south Asians are UNDERrepresented in CSE stats, whereas whites are OVERrepresented)

It means you are no better then all those social workers and police who didn't act on abuse because the perpetrators where muslim.

 

[matticus]

... more exciting for people like you and the fans of the rapist-paedophile president.

You do get some gems on this forum from time-to-time!

 

[multitool]

I think you're completely right to challenge the racist sh1t-stirrers who try to make something of these gangs' ethnicity.

But is it OK for MI5 (and other gov agencies) to focus primarliy on Islamic terrorism over other types?

The security services focus on threats as presented to them.

So do the police actually, which is why you won't hear them saying that they devote extra resources to policing Muslim CSE, because that group is underrepresented in CSE stats. Sure there are differences in the nature of CSE as committed by various groups, but it's all CSE.

 

[multitool]

Local inquiries won't cut it, for reasons already discussed. Your interest is to grab on to anything remotely tainted with the whiff of anything even vaguely right wing and use it as a stick to beat others with, regardless of what that issue is and whether there is any merit to it. And in doing so shut down further discussion on here by being as personal and obnoxious as you can about it. It works on forums I suppose but it doesn't seem to be working in the real world.

There's plenty of discussion about 'Muslim rape gangs' out there on the Internet. Mostly far right groups, but if the cap fits.

A 'discussion' here will make no difference at all to the victims. But punting an anti-muslim agenda using this as a stick with which to beat all Muslims will affect many.

The thing about you is that the concerns you air on here align with your personal socio-political views and certainly isn't based on a concern for victims. You claim to care about women's rights and abuse against women...but weirdly only if committed by trans women. Here, you are claiming to care about female rape victims...but only those raped by Muslims.

It's almost as if you might be a bigot.

 

[Ian H]

From the same playbook:-
Is it an impossibility that 20 years from now, it will be the UK, not China or Russia, that will emerge as the greatest strategic threat to the USA? Born out of a broken relationship and weak leadership. What happens if the UK falls into the hands of Muslim fundamentalism, our legal system gets substituted by Sharia Law and our nuclear capabilities vest in a regime not to dissimilar to that of Iran today? [S Braverman]

 

[C R]

From the same playbook:-
Is it an impossibility that 20 years from now, it will be the UK, not China or Russia, that will emerge as the greatest strategic threat to the USA? Born out of a broken relationship and weak leadership. What happens if the UK falls into the hands of Muslim fundamentalism, our legal system gets substituted by Sharia Law and our nuclear capabilities vest in a regime not to dissimilar to that of Iran today? [S Braverman]

Is she really stupid enough to believe this crap or is she just pandering to the terminally stupid.

 

[Ian H]

Is she really stupid enough to believe this crap or is she just pandering to the terminally stupid.

She's phrased it cunningly. An honest answer would have to be 'No, it's obviously not impossible, but it is so unlikely...' By which time you've lost your audience and they think she has a point.

 

[AuroraSaab]

The thing about you is that the concerns you air on here align with your personal socio-political views and certainly isn't based on a concern for victims. You claim to care about women's rights and abuse against women...but weirdly only if committed by trans women. Here, you are claiming to care about female rape victims...but only those raped by Muslims.

It's almost as if you might be a bigot.

That's bs, as any look at my posting history will show. Meanwhile your faux concern for women vanishes at any point where their rights conflict with those demanded by men, and your cover for this is to shout fascist Nazi bigot at anybody who says no. Unfortunately for you a lot of women are now saying no so I guess raging out your misogyny on a tiny forum like this is your best option these days.

 

[multitool]

LOL. Your posting history shows exactly what I describe.

No point pretending I'm a misogynist, when it's bigots I dislike

 

[AuroraSaab]

When your definition of bigot means anybody who objects to men in women's spaces, sports, and services, then you're going to find that 99% of the world are bigots.

 

[multitool]

See, you are even spreading your transphobia into every thread you touch.

It's an obsession.

 

[AuroraSaab]

women...but weirdly only if committed by trans women.

You introduced the topic of trans identifying men into the thread in the above post, as you know.

You'll continue to do it in every thread I post in because being abusive and calling people bigots is where every thread, on every topic, with just about every poster, always ends up with you. You are fundamentally unable to have a discussion without derogatory name calling.

 

[multitool]

You seem to want to be a bigot but not be called a bigot. This is like you not wanting fascists to be called fascists.

You should own it. Have the courage of your convictions.

 

[AuroraSaab]

If thinking men shouldn't be in women's spaces, sports or services is bigotry then by your definition I'm a bigot. Thinking they should be is misogyny and you've certainly claimed that title and wear it proudly. Once again every thread you bless with your magic touch descends into tiresome name calling.

 

[multitool]

I reserve it purely for the two biggest bigots on the forum.

You and your spiritual bed-fellow Cxr