Riot!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

AndyRM

Elder Goth
F*cking hell. Amateurs?

That's beyond warped.
 
Hardly a rant. You took the opportunity once again to compare apples with oranges and pretend that sexual abuse within a family is the same as a repetitive pattern of organised grooming and trafficking of children seen in a dozen towns over decades.

And you do this because right wingers like Tommy Robinson opportunistically took it up as a cause (along with many of the victims and other very un-right wing advocates). As such you prefer to flash your anti fascist credentials by minimising the scale and nature of these offences at the expense of the girls who suffered rather than consider that there are factors that merit inquiry.
 

multitool

Pharaoh
You just imagined all of that up in your head :laugh:

Rent free.

Maybe I should have written "rape gang" and not "Grooming gang", but in the context of the point I was making it doesn't matter a jot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
What point are you making, seeing as you are comparing two dissimilar types of sexual abuse?

It renders a century of the development of the science of criminology a waste of time if your point is that all sexual abuse is the same and there is nothing to be learned from analysis of patterns re victims, perpetrators, or circumstances.
 
Last edited:

multitool

Pharaoh
What point are you making, seeing as you are comparing two dissimilar types of sexual abuse?

Two huge rants and finally you admit you didn't understand the point being made.

Beebo did ;)
 
I'd usually call it wilful ignorance to pretend there were no cultural factors at play in these offences (in both the patterns of perpetrators and of the victims) but it's not ignorance here, it's some weird idea that by denying the experience of scores of girls over decades you're somehow getting one over on right wing band wagoners like Tommy Robinson.
 

Ian H

Legendary Member
I'd usually call it wilful ignorance to pretend there were no cultural factors at play in these offences (in both the patterns of perpetrators and of the victims) but it's not ignorance here, it's some weird idea that by denying the experience of scores of girls over decades you're somehow getting one over on right wing band wagoners like Tommy Robinson.

What cultural factors did the court mention?
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

multitool

Pharaoh
I'd usually call it wilful ignorance to pretend there were no cultural factors at play in these offences (in both the patterns of perpetrators and of the victims) but it's not ignorance here, it's some weird idea that by denying the experience of scores of girls over decades you're somehow getting one over on right wing band wagoners like Tommy Robinson.

It's those noises in your head again.
 
It's not an individual judge's job to make wider comments on national patterns of abuse. They can only offer comment on cases that aren't in front of them. It would probably be grounds for appeal if he/she did.

The Jay report says cultural factors were contributory to the abuse. The victims say cultural factors were contributory.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...s-religious-extremism-terrorism-a8261831.html

Screenshot_20250127_211901_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20250127_211925_Chrome.jpg



The Casey report on Rotherham social services says the reluctance to acknowledge the demographic of the offenders was contributory to how these girls were failed.

It's ridiculous to ignore the common patterns and pretend that the common denominator is career choice to work in fast food or cab driving.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250127_213949_OneDrive.jpg
    Screenshot_20250127_213949_OneDrive.jpg
    159.6 KB · Views: 0

Ian H

Legendary Member
The excuses or reasons they gave were culturally specific. That doesn't show that they were any more or less likely to commit the crimes. Someone from a different cultural background would doubtless have used other justifications - it proves nothing.
 
The large numbers of defendants coming from the same cultural background - in fact a very specific sub section of that group - is of no relevance whatsoever? The victims telling us that their abusers explicitly said these things is irrelevant?

Where are the grooming gangs, in the same numbers, from other cultural groups? And I'm not talking about family abuse or individual abusers, I'm talking about street grooming, which is what these cases are.

When other groups use excuses eg Catholic priests saying 'No one will believe you because I'm a priest' we acknowledge that that was a culture generated within the Catholic Church that facilitated abuse and needed to be addressed.
When children are sexually abused within a cult we acknowledge that the culture played a role in facilitating it.

The gymnastics you're prepared to do to avoid being tainted with being even remotely prejudiced is causing you to abandon common sense. Never mind what the reports, whistle-blowers, and victims say, only CycleChatters know the real story and there's nothing to see here, move along.
 
Top Bottom