Annoyance at more absolute BS regarding a astronmoical 'event'. This time I've seen numerous posts online about the 'rare Black Moon'. There's basically nothing to see, it's just a new moon like you get every month but someone has now decided to give a stupid name to the third new moon in a season that contains four of them, that's literally all that makes it different as most seasons only have three.
Yes, but saying it's a new moon isn't going to generate clicks, is it? And then the advertisers won't pay for the article!
The Eye has an article about the Mirror. Every Mirror news story now has a hyperlink sentence about 3 sentences in which starts "this comes after..." and links to another news article
which is completely unrelated and has nothing to do with the story!
I read an article about the tragic death of a young girl in Iceland when she and her parents ignored the warning signs on the black sand beach and went for a paddle (the beach has powerful sneaker waves - if one gets you you are dragged out to sea in arctic water - you live for minutes. But
this comes after kitesurfer sees stick in ocean with something alive at the end of it.
Of course, I was intrigued to see what the link was. Why would someone be kitesurfing in arctic waters? DId they manage to save someone from drowning off the coast of Iceland?
No. They were in Malta and rescued a Sea Turtle.