You'll note that I didn't say Starmer was supporting genocide, I observed that he might be factoring it into his 'calculated decisions'. As it happens I take the position that failing to call for a ceasefire to be support of current Israeli actions. If we're talking about international law then I can't say it's definitely genocide as that has a specific legal definition and also as I linked above, it's debatable whether the right to self defence applies here. If Israel doesn't recognise Palestine as an independent state and Hamas as its legitimate government (and I'm not suggesting that anybody should) then what it's fighting is not a defensive war against an aggressive neighbour, but a counter terrorism operation or counter insurgency.
But back to Starmer, I am now less likely to vote Labour than I was a month ago. Do you think he's factored that into his calculations?