secretsqirrel
Active Member
Worth reading the whole of Magnus's letter, if you've not already done so.
View attachment 9822
View attachment 9823
View attachment 9824
Fair.
Worth reading the whole of Magnus's letter, if you've not already done so.
View attachment 9822
View attachment 9823
View attachment 9824
Fair.
Well done guys! Another woman in a position of power has been forced to resign. If she was a white, middle age bloke she would’ve been fine.
Well done! You must be so proud. *slow handclap*
BTW, I’m not and never have been a Labour voter or supporter but I can see double standards and misogyny a mile off.
What as, gobby tax dodger.
Her political career is over really. She will melt into the backbenchers, Starmer is already tainted badly by this saga. Bringing her back in the future, will just resurface the same comments
Farage is a white, middle age bloke but Raymer isn’t.
Farage is being paid to do a job that he’s not doing and trash talking the UK at every opportunity and uses a private company to avoid tax.
But, women, Eh?
My mates son is buying a second house, but putting it in his girlfriends name to access first time buyer benefits
Tax planning![]()
Hopefully, the relationship will last 🙂
That used to be the case, but since liberals got spanked after going against their supporters. Voters have become more and more critical of politiciansI admire your optimism in the electorates memory
The thread is about Starmer's vision as you keep pointing out the indiscretions of his MP's have nothing whatsoever to do with his 'vision'.
Reverting to cheap insults and trying to suggest other forum members are stupid is a bit silly to be honest. Let's keep it civil and not act like plonkers.
I may have miss-understood, it has been known, but, I thought the Deputy Leader / Deputy Prime Minister role was decided by the Labour Party Membership?
So, they have polled approximately 300,000 people, and got a result, in 48 hours?, I am impressed.
Really, you mean the "indiscretions" have no impact on Starmer's implementation of his vision?
You really are making yourself look a fool. Especially when you post about what Boris Johnson did...that have even less to do with Starmer's vision quest
If you keep making yourself look stupid, then don't be surprised if you get called out for it
It isn't. Rayner acted with integrity and the tax mistake was due to a complex set of rules that she did not set out to breach. Farage has no integrity and his tax avoidance was deliberate because although he pretends to be a patriot he's a feckless liar, tax dodger, scrounger and arse-licker.I know it is. Maybe you can explain how his situation is the same as Rayners viz a viz underpayment of tax - in a reasonable amount of detail.