Starmer's vision quest

[briantrumpet]

Oh dear

(my bold).
BBC podcast today and Labour insiders appearing on the program (ie not anonymous sources) saying that Mandleson was really one of McSweeney's "friends"/group and that Starmer isn't a fan seeing him as a Blairite and thus mistrusted him. Makes me wonder if the information about the emails was withheld/"delayed" in the hope some way to keep Mandleson in place could be found. How much of Starmer's failings stem from those he has appointed around himself (although in many respects Starmer appointed them so Starmer is ultimately "responsible"). And who was it that said "advisers advise, Ministers decide"

I'm still not sure if McSweeney (and Glasman) are causes or symptoms, but most of their viewpoints would sit quite comfortably in Reform.

 

[briantrumpet]

Must admit that I've not really paid much attention to her, but her background looks suitable. (I suspect that The Times' choice of photos isn't entirely random - I don't think they do similar for a male candidate.)

 

[Stevo 666]

Well they can apply for a job as a tube train driver then?

Well here's the problem - it's a closed shop:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...-that-keeps-a-union-stranglehold-on-the-tube/

 

[Rusty Nails]

It was there for a reason...

Weasel words usually are!

 

[midlandsgrimpeur]

Well here's the problem - it's a closed shop:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...-that-keeps-a-union-stranglehold-on-the-tube/

As opposed to those well known bastions of inclusive recruitment largely populated by the well connected upper and middle class; investment banking, barristers, print media, academia.....

 

[BoldonLad]

As opposed to those well known bastions of inclusive recruitment largely populated by the well connected upper and middle class; investment banking, barristers, print media, academia.....

true, but, two wrongs don't make a right, about time we got rid of all such schemes?