AndyRM
Elder Goth
Why should a sporting event or supporters be interrupted/banned, just because it's an Israeli club
Two tier stuff innit?
Russia (amongst others) have been sanctioned for years at numerous sporting events.
But Israel's cool.
Why should a sporting event or supporters be interrupted/banned, just because it's an Israeli club
Two tier stuff innit?
Russia (amongst others) have been sanctioned for years at numerous sporting events.
But Israel's cool.
Maybe this is just me, but has anybody else noticed that politicians are increasingly using the phrase ''and this is personal to me'' in order to be more persuasive?
Is it not the privilege of MPs to be elected as the representatives of their constituents?
Is it not the case that those with a personal interest are required to recuse themselves in order to avoid a conflict of interests?
Starmer does have an interest in this. He is married to a Jewish woman. His children being are raised in the Jewish tradition. All of which is obviously fair enough.
Whether he is bringing his home and family life to work or not, the fact that the allegation can be made, should require him to recuse himself from the situation? Otherwise doesn't this open another line of 'they're all in it for their own interests'?
Why should a sporting event or supporters be interrupted/banned, just because it's an Israeli club
Interesting point. That could mean a lot of MPs recusing themselves from various topics, immediately, catholics and abortion or assisted dying spring to mind, but, I am sure there are many more.
I disagree, they entered into miltary conflict after October 7th.
Just because the were more casualties on the Palestinian side doesn't mean the rest of your statement is correct.
There is no outrage for these conflicts
View: https://x.com/NJBeisner/status/1948945066292294064?t=jUiobyrEZptpSoU2ejbBUA&s=19
Why can't Israel defend itself or take retribution
Anybody who thinks conflict in around Gaza began at 07-10 needs their bumps felt.