Starmer's vision quest

[briantrumpet]

I'm in blissful ignorance of the posts to which people are responding with facts. The sooner that people realise that facts are woke, and woke is wrong, therefore facts are bad, the sooner they'll realise there's no point in trying to use them in rebuttal of People Who Don't Like Facts.

 

[BoldonLad]

Starmer desperate to save his skin, by promising rayner a spot in his cabinet

Yes, see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7vmlmm9343o

Apparently, she is the best example of social
Mobility this country has ever seen.

Interesting, since I have a cousin who has done a tad better than her.

 

[BoldonLad]

This one's even better...

View attachment 11497

Is that chart for Greater London, or City of London or ?

 

[AuroraSaab]

He's looking to keep the Labour left on board and needs help to shore up his support from that side of the party. That's why Starmer is having Rayner back, not as a figure of social mobility to inspire the rest of us.

 

[Pblakeney]

Starmer never wanted to get rid of her. She was put in the naughty step.

 

[AndyRM]

Is that chart for Greater London, or City of London or ?

Greater London. The City of London is even more overwhelmingly Christian, although "No religion" is a close second.

 

[midlandsgrimpeur]

Interesting, since I have a cousin who has done a tad better than her.

Is it Rachel Reeves?

 

[secretsqirrel]

Is it Rachel Reeves?

Liz Truss?

 

[bobzmyunkle]

He's looking to keep the Labour left on board and needs help to shore up his support from that side of the party. That's why Starmer is having Rayner back, not as a figure of social mobility to inspire the rest of us.

I'm sure I read elsewhere that Ang and Wes are plotting to oust Starmer - Independent.
Or Ang is going for the leadership herself - Telegraph.
I guess you can get odds on all of these possibilities if you're that way inclined.
The only certainty - the outlook is bleak. What odds can I get on that?

 

[secretsqirrel]

I'm sure I read elsewhere that Ang and Wes are plotting to oust Starmer - Independent.
Or Ang is going for the leadership herself - Telegraph.
I guess you can get odds on all of these possibilities if you're that way inclined.
The only certainty - the outlook is bleak. What odds can I get on that?

Question: “Will you rule out ever running for leadership?
Answer: “No”

There for <Labour person> plans to oust leader. Simples.

 

[Rusty Nails]

Apparently, she is the best example of social
Mobility this country has ever seen.

She is indeed a very good example of social mobility but I think Starmer was being a tad hyperbolical there.

 

[Rusty Nails]

Is it Rachel Reeves?

Nah, Cheryl Tweedy.

 

[First Aspect]

He's looking to keep the Labour left on board and needs help to shore up his support from that side of the party. That's why Starmer is having Rayner back, not as a figure of social mobility to inspire the rest of us.

She's popular within the party and would have a good shot in a leadership challenge. Keep your friends close and....

 

[BoldonLad]

Is it Rachel Reeves?

Much more successful than Ms Reeves (a low bar)

 

[Rusty Nails]

Much more successful than Ms Reeves (a low bar)

In that case it must be Sarah Millican, or that Geordie woman on Dragons' Den. You must be so proud to have one of those two in the family.